Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychophysical evaluation for visual prosthesis.

Gislin Dagnelie1

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205-2020, USA. gislin@jhu.edu

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering
|April 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Low Vision Assessment in Virtual Reality (LVAVR): Spatial Computing in Virtual Reality and Real-World.

2026 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops·2026
Same author

Gamification Enhances User Engagement and Task Performance in Prosthetic Vision Testing.

Translational vision science & technology·2026
Same author

Autonomous multisensory enhancement of a visual neuroprosthesis for navigation: technical proof-of-concept with simulated prosthetic vision and single-subject case study of a visual prosthesis user.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Gamification Enhances User Engagement and Task Performance in Prosthetic Vision Testing.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

The Role of Scalp EEG Recordings During Cortical Visual Prosthesis Testing.

Artificial organs·2025
Same author

Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Chinese Version of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-50.

Translational vision science & technology·2024
Same journal

Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Advancements and Challenges in Computer-Assisted Medical Interventions for Image-Guided Prostate Cancer Treatments.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Recent Advances in mRNA Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence-Based Analysis of Laparoscopic Imaging for Intraoperative Surgical Decision Support.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Viscoelasticity of the Heart: An Overview of Viscoelastic Measurements at Different Scales.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
Same journal

Digital Twins for Biofluids.

Annual review of biomedical engineering·2026
See all related articles

Developing effective visual prostheses requires careful patient selection and rigorous efficacy benchmarks. This study outlines crucial evaluation methods for vision restoration devices, emphasizing functional assessment and rehabilitation strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Vision restoration through implants is advancing rapidly, moving towards clinical applications.
  • Limited attention has been given to efficacy benchmarks and recipient selection for visual prostheses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine aspects of vision restoration using prostheses.
  • To define selection criteria and preparation for early recipients.
  • To detail pre- and post-implant evaluations for safety and efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on functional assessment, particularly psychophysical methodology.
  • Inclusion of other safety and efficacy measures.
  • Discussion of vision rehabilitation approaches with prostheses.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Identified critical gaps in efficacy benchmarks and recipient selection for visual prostheses.
  • Proposed a framework for evaluating visual prosthesis safety and efficacy.
  • Highlighted the importance of psychophysical methods in functional assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized benchmarks and careful patient selection are essential for successful visual prostheses.
  • A comprehensive evaluation strategy, including functional and safety measures, is needed.
  • Simulations can aid in the development and rehabilitation process for visual prostheses.