Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single and multiple input modules in regulatory networks.

Arun S Konagurthu1, Arthur M Lesk

  • 1The Huck Institute for Genomics, Proteomics, and Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA. arun@bx.psu.edu

Proteins
|April 25, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PhiSiCal-Checkup: A Bayesian framework to validate amino acid conformations within experimental protein structures.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Editorial: Computational and experimental protein variant interpretation in the era of precision medicine.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2024
Same author

Getting 'ϕψχal' with proteins: minimum message length inference of joint distributions of backbone and sidechain dihedral angles.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2023
Same author

Sequence and structure alignments in post-AlphaFold era.

Current opinion in structural biology·2023
Same author

Protein structure prediction improves the quality of amino-acid sequence alignment.

Proteins·2022
Same author

On the reliability and the limits of inference of amino acid sequence alignments.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2022
Same journal

Engineered HSP90-MP65 Bivalent Fusion Antigen: A Novel Vaccine Candidate Against Invasive Candidiasis.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Physics-Based Energy Functions for Computational Protein Design.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Impact of Stabilizing Osmolytes on the Conformational Dynamics of Human and Rat Islet Amyloid Polypeptides.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Stabilization of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 at Physiological pH: Contrasting Roles of CHAPS and Arginine in Aggregation Inhibition.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Structural Insights Into the Function of Leishmania major Adenylosuccinate Lyase.

Proteins·2026
Same journal

Generalizing the Gaussian Network Model: Spanning-Tree Thermodynamics Shows Entropy-Driven KRAS Activation.

Proteins·2026
See all related articles

This study provides clear definitions and algorithms for identifying single-input modules (SIMs) and multiple-input modules (MIMs) in gene regulatory networks. Reanalysis of yeast networks reveals significant differences from prior work, necessitating revisions in understanding gene regulation motifs.

Area of Science:

  • Systems Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Gene regulatory networks control gene expression through transcription factor interactions.
  • Canonical network motifs like feed-forward loops (FFLs), single-input modules (SIMs), and multiple-input modules (MIMs) are crucial for network analysis.
  • Existing definitions for SIMs and MIMs lack clarity and consistency, hindering accurate motif identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish a complete and consistent definition for SIMs and MIMs.
  • To develop algorithms for enumerating SIMs and MIMs in any given network.
  • To re-evaluate motif distributions in the Yeast regulatory network and compare findings with previous studies.

Main Methods:

  • Development of novel algorithms for the consistent enumeration of SIMs and MIMs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Algorithmic comparison of the computational complexity for enumerating FFLs, SIMs, and MIMs.
  • Reanalysis of the Yeast regulatory network motif distributions using the new definitions and algorithms.

    • Main Results:

    • Provided the first comprehensive and consistent definitions for SIMs and MIMs.
    • Demonstrated that enumerating SIMs and MIMs is algorithmically more challenging than enumerating FFLs.
    • Identified significant discrepancies in motif counts compared to Luscombe et al. (2004), indicating a need for revised conclusions.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed definitions and algorithms offer a standardized approach to identifying SIMs and MIMs.
    • The reanalysis highlights potential inaccuracies in previous interpretations of yeast gene regulatory network motifs.
    • This work necessitates a revision of conclusions drawn from earlier motif distribution studies in yeast.