Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation01:22

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation

The instrumentation of atomic emission spectrometry (AES) involves various components, including atomization devices that convert samples into gas-phase atoms and ions. There are two main types of atomization devices: continuous and discrete atomizers.  Continuous atomizers, like plasmas and flames, introduce samples in a constant stream, while discrete atomizers inject individual samples using syringes or autosamplers. The most common discrete atomizer is the electrothermal atomizer.
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Instrumentation01:22

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Instrumentation

An atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) comprises several components: a radiation source, an atomizer, a monochromator, and a detector. The radiation source can be a hollow-cathode lamp (HCL) or an electrodeless-discharge lamp (EDL), both of which provide a narrow emission line of the required wavelength. However, some instruments use continuum sources and high-resolution monochromators to achieve a narrow range of radiation.
The atomizer used in AAS can be either a flame atomizer or an...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab01:29

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab

AES is a powerful analytical technique, especially effective when used with plasma sources, producing abundant spectra in characteristic emission lines. The Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP), in particular, yields superior quantitative analytical data due to its high stability, low noise, low background, and minimal interferences under optimal experimental conditions. However, newer air-operated microwave sources are emerging as promising alternatives that could be more cost-effective than...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference01:25

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference

Interference leads to systematic error in atomic absorption (AA) measurements by enhancing or diminishing the analytical signal or the background. These interferences can be grouped into three main categories: spectral interference, chemical interference, and physical interference.
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...
Positron Emission Tomography01:29

Positron Emission Tomography

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique involving radiopharmaceuticals — substances that emit short-lived radiation. Although the first PET scanner was introduced in 1961, it took 15 more years before radiopharmaceuticals were combined with the technique and revolutionized its potential.
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body being...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab01:21

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab

For AAS measurements, samples must be introduced as clear solutions, often requiring extensive preliminary treatment to dissolve materials like soils, animal tissues, and minerals. Common methods for sample preparation include treatment with hot mineral acids, wet ashing, combustion in closed containers, high-temperature ashing, or fusion with reagents.
 Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing nebulizer...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

<sup>18</sup>F-NaF PET/CT Versus <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for Baseline Mapping in Ollier Disease: A Pediatric Case.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026
Same journal

Incidental Detection of Aggressive HER2-Positive Breast Cancer on <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Sestamibi Parathyroid Scintigraphy.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026
Same journal

Structured Educational Tours in Hospital-Based Radiopharmaceutical Production: Balancing Safety and Learning.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026
Same journal

Development of a Phantom for Evaluating Image Quality and Partial-Volume Effects in Hot and Cold Regions in Small-Animal SPECT and PET.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026
Same journal

Nonuniformity in a Certified <sup>68</sup>Ge PET Cylinder Phantom: Implications for Normalization Quality Assurance.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026
Same journal

Reducing Formation of Suspected Tracer Microemboli During Preparation of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-Tagged Heat-Damaged Red Blood Cells.

Journal of nuclear medicine technology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor
10:24

Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor

Published on: May 7, 2021

CT artifact recognition for the nuclear technologist.

Robert Popilock1, Kumar Sandrasagaren, Lowell Harris

  • 1Division of CT, Philips Medical, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Robert.popilock@philips.com

Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology
|May 17, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This article helps PET/CT and SPECT/CT operators identify common computed tomography (CT) artifacts. Understanding these image quality issues is crucial for accurate diagnostic imaging and diagnosis.

More Related Videos

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Screening Using HEp-2 Cells
13:01

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Screening Using HEp-2 Cells

Published on: June 23, 2014

Standardized Method to Detect Tunneling Nanotubes in Human Skin Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications
07:15

Standardized Method to Detect Tunneling Nanotubes in Human Skin Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications

Published on: January 13, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor
10:24

Neutron Radiography and Computed Tomography of Biological Systems at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory's High Flux Isotope Reactor

Published on: May 7, 2021

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Screening Using HEp-2 Cells
13:01

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Screening Using HEp-2 Cells

Published on: June 23, 2014

Standardized Method to Detect Tunneling Nanotubes in Human Skin Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications
07:15

Standardized Method to Detect Tunneling Nanotubes in Human Skin Cells for Tissue Engineering Applications

Published on: January 13, 2026

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging Physics
  • Radiological Technology

Background:

  • Accurate diagnosis in medical imaging relies on optimal image quality.
  • Image artifacts compromise diagnostic accuracy in computed tomography (CT).
  • Recognizing and mitigating CT artifacts is essential for technologists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To educate PET/CT and SPECT/CT operators about prevalent CT artifacts.
  • To enhance awareness of factors degrading CT image quality.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of the fundamental principles leading to CT image artifacts.
  • Explanation of how CT linear attenuation images deviate from actual tissue properties.
  • Overview of inherent limitations in CT data acquisition and reconstruction.

Main Results:

  • CT images are inherently affected by quantum noise due to x-ray physics.
  • The use of polyenergetic x-ray beams contributes to image artifacts.
  • Finite detector dimensions, focal spots, sampling, and acquisition times introduce image inaccuracies.

Conclusions:

  • Awareness of CT artifact sources is critical for PET/CT and SPECT/CT operators.
  • Understanding the physical basis of artifacts aids in image quality assessment.
  • Minimizing artifacts ensures reliable diagnostic interpretations in hybrid imaging.