Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gene expression in Deinococcus radiodurans.

M D Smith1, C I Masters, E Lennon

  • 1Department of Pathology, F.E. Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814-4799.

Gene
|February 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of prostaglandin E and F receptor agonists in vivo on luteal function in ewes.

Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators·2010
Same author

Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1), but not prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), alters luteal and endometrial luteinizing hormone (LH) occupied and unoccupied LH receptors and mRNA for LH receptors in ovine luteal tissue to prevent luteolysis.

Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators·2010
Same author

Is endothelin-1 luteolytic or antiluteolytic in ewes?

Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators·2009
Same author

Mechanism whereby nitric oxide (NO) infused chronically intrauterine in ewes is antiluteolytic rather than being luteolytic.

Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators·2007
Same author

Chlortetracycline supplementation of yearling dairy heifers.

Journal of animal science·2006
Same author

Is nitric oxide luteolytic or antiluteolytic?

Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators·2005
Same journal

Face/off: phase-specific modeling of lineage plasticity using near-patient models in genitourinary cancers.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical analysis of metabolic phenotype reveals distinct microbiota and circulatory transcriptome in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Mutation T71R enhanced the structural stability and functional activity of wild type superoxide dismutase cloned from soil metagenome.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Reduced ATXN1 expression as an adverse prognostic indicator in Acute myeloid leukemia.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Constructing regulatory networks of Rubisco post-translational modifications: a novel avenue for engineering environment adaptive plants.

Gene·2026
Same journal

Traumatic brain injury enhances fracture healing by upregulating VNN1 to activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Gene·2026
See all related articles

Introducing Escherichia coli genes into Deinococcus radiodurans requires specific promoters for effective expression. Deinococcus radiodurans promoters enable efficient gene expression in this bacterium, but not always in E. coli.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetic Engineering

Background:

  • Previous studies showed Escherichia coli drug-resistance genes (aphA, cat) required significant amplification in Deinococcus radiodurans.
  • This amplification was a barrier to efficient gene expression and manipulation in D. radiodurans.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate methods for efficient expression of E. coli genes in D. radiodurans without extensive chromosomal amplification.
  • To identify and characterize Deinococcus radiodurans promoter elements that can drive gene expression.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized promoter-probe plasmids with deleted E. coli promoters and cloned D. radiodurans upstream sequences.
  • Constructed E. coli-D. radiodurans shuttle plasmids using D. radiodurans plasmid pUE10 fragments upstream of promoterless genes (cat, tet).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Created translational fusions between D. radiodurans genes and E. coli lacZ.

    • Main Results:

    • Insertion of D. radiodurans sequences upstream of promoterless E. coli genes enabled expression without significant amplification.
    • Shuttle plasmids with D. radiodurans promoter fragments expressed cat and tet genes in D. radiodurans but not E. coli.
    • D. radiodurans-lacZ fusions showed variable expression in E. coli, indicating promoter specificity.

    Conclusions:

    • Deinococcus radiodurans promoters are essential for efficient expression of heterologous genes like E. coli cat, tet, and lacZ.
    • Promoter elements from D. radiodurans are often not functional in E. coli, highlighting species-specific transcriptional regulation.
    • This work provides a foundation for genetic manipulation and expression studies in D. radiodurans.