Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

Surface modifications of dental implants.

C M Stanford1

  • 1Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Clark-Stanford@uiowa.edu

Australian Dental Journal
|August 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Issues and considerations in dental implant occlusion: what do we know, and what do we need to find out?

Journal of the California Dental Association·2005
Same author

Removal of supragingival plaque in an intraoral model by use of the Sonicare toothbrush.

Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology·2003
Same author

In situ evaluation of sodium hexametaphosphate-containing dentifrices.

Caries research·2002
Same author

Primary adult human bone cells do not respond to tissue (continuum) level strains.

Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association·2001
Same author

Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2001
Same author

Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants.

Advances in dental research·2001
Same journal

Extensive Cervicofacial and Mediastinal Emphysema Following Subgingival Air-Polishing for Peri-Implantitis: A Case Report.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

What Outcomes Matter in Vital Pulp Therapy? Current Concepts and Challenges.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Perspectives of Oral Health Practitioners Working in Rural New South Wales: Culture, Wellbeing and Workforce Sustainability.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Misquoting of Scientific Literature.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Surface Physical and Mechanical Properties of Short Fibre Reinforced Composite Resins in Direct Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

Australian dental journal·2026
Same journal

Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D-Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study.

Australian dental journal·2026
See all related articles

Dental implant surface technologies accelerate bone growth for faster tooth replacement. Advanced features like specific thread designs and nanotopography improve implant stability and reduce bone loss, enhancing treatment predictability.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Dental implant outcomes are highly predictable, but certain conditions still lead to implant loss.
  • Rapid advancements in implant surface technologies aim to accelerate bone formation and improve treatment predictability.
  • Understanding implant-macro-retentive features is crucial for enhancing success rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the impact of macro-retentive features on dental implant outcomes.
  • To explore how surface modifications and implant designs influence bone formation and stability.
  • To highlight the role of topography in bone cell response and gene expression.

Main Methods:

  • Review of literature on dental implant surface technologies and macro-retentive features.

More Related Videos

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

In Vitro Evaluation of The Effects Of Er,Cr:YSGG and Diode Lasers Used on Titanium Cylinder
07:05

In Vitro Evaluation of The Effects Of Er,Cr:YSGG and Diode Lasers Used on Titanium Cylinder

Published on: June 6, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 5, 2026

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
06:36

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

Published on: March 14, 2025

In Vitro Evaluation of The Effects Of Er,Cr:YSGG and Diode Lasers Used on Titanium Cylinder
07:05

In Vitro Evaluation of The Effects Of Er,Cr:YSGG and Diode Lasers Used on Titanium Cylinder

Published on: June 6, 2025

  • Analysis of implant designs including surface oxide modification, thread design, press-fit, and sintered-bead technologies.
  • Examination of studies on the effects of microscopic and nanotopographical features on bone cells.

    • Main Results:

    • Macro-retentive features, controlled lateral compression, and specific thread designs enhance primary implant stability and reduce crestal bone loss.
    • Implant surface topography, including nanotopography, significantly influences bone cell behavior and promotes bone-related gene expression.
    • Bone cells demonstrate sensitivity to topographical cues, upregulating bone formation genes on specific implant surfaces.

    Conclusions:

    • Advanced dental implant surface technologies and designs offer significant potential for expedited implant therapy.
    • Controlled mechanical stress and optimized surface topography are key factors in achieving predictable and successful implant outcomes.
    • Continued research and critical evaluation of new technologies are essential for advancing tooth replacement therapy and patient care.