Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Outsmarting the liars: the benefit of asking unanticipated questions
Aldert Vrij1, Sharon Leal, Pär Anders Granhag
1Psychology Department, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry 1 Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK. aldert.vrij@port.ac.uk
Abstract:
We hypothesised that the responses of pairs of liars would correspond less with each other than would responses of pairs of truth tellers, but only when the responses are given to unanticipated questions. Liars and truth tellers were interviewed individually about having had lunch together in a restaurant. The interviewer asked typical opening questions which we expected the liars to anticipate, followed by questions about spatial and/or temporal information which we expected suspects not to anticipate, and also a request to draw the layout of the restaurant. The results supported the hypothesis, and based on correspondence in responses to the unanticipated questions, up to 80% of liars and truth tellers could be correctly classified, particularly when assessing drawings.
Related Concept Videos
Hindsight Biases
Understanding Deception
Confirmation Biases
Counterfactual Thinking
Reason and Intuition
Naturalistic Observations
