Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does face familiarity influence speechreadability?

Karen Lander1, Rebecca Davies

  • 1School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. karen.lander@manchester.ac.uk

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|June 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interstitial lung disease fatigue and breathlessness (ILD-FAB) programme: a multidisciplinary feasibility study.

BMJ open respiratory research·2026
Same author

Exploring the importance of shape on dynamic recognition of self-face or friend-face.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Investigating the Effect of Tumour Necrosis Factor Antagonist on Olfaction.

Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2026
Same author

Facial emotion recognition, empathy & psychopathic traits: understanding differential effects of measures.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD): modification of a pre-existing measure.

BMJ open respiratory research·2026
Same author

Consistent Eye Movement Patterns in Static and Dynamic Face Recognition: A Hidden Markov Model Study.

Brain sciences·2025
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Familiarity with a speaker

Area of Science:

  • Auditory and Visual Perception
  • Speech Processing
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Speechreading (lipreading) is crucial for auditory-visual communication.
  • Understanding factors that enhance speechreading is vital for improving communication aids.
  • Individual differences in face and voice perception influence speechreading ability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how face familiarity impacts speechreading performance.
  • To determine if familiarity with the same speaker enhances speechreading more than general practice.
  • To explore the role of talker-specific characteristics in speechreading.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed baseline speechreading performance with unfamiliar faces.
  • Implemented familiarization phases involving same-speaker face/voice, different-speaker face/voice, or a control task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured speechreading performance after each familiarization phase.

    • Main Results:

    • Speechreading performance improved with practice.
    • Significant performance gains were observed with increased familiarity with the same speaker.
    • Familiarity with talker-specific variations positively influences speechreading.

    Conclusions:

    • Talker-specific variations are important cues for speechreading.
    • Familiarity with a specific speaker enhances speechreading ability beyond general practice.
    • These findings have implications for designing more effective speechreading training and assistive technologies.