Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Actions modulate attentional capture.

Timothy N Welsh1, Jay Pratt

  • 1Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. N.W., Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. twelsh@kin.ucalgary.ca

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|June 24, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The mind's average: Unseen, internally generated ensemble representations can guide visual attention.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same author

Athletic clothing style and comfort: Associations with appearance monitoring, social physique anxiety, and task concentration among women.

Women's health (London, England)·2026
Same author

'Not so intuitive' physics: Orientation supersedes stability in prioritizing attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Rapid development of inhibitory effects in response to novel features: It's mostly target-feature enhancement.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Anodal tDCS over the supplementary motor area increases motor overflow during imagined aiming movement.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

The action system influences attention by modulating stimulus properties based on response expectations. This study found that how stimuli capture attention depends on the task, affecting interference effects in different action systems.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Attention is crucial for processing information.
  • Stimulus characteristics, like dynamic discontinuities, can involuntarily capture attention.
  • The role of action systems in attentional capture is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the action system influences which stimulus characteristics capture attention.
  • To assess interference effects of dynamic discontinuities with varying action affordances.
  • To determine how stimulus-response expectations modulate attentional set.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed interference effects using dynamic visual stimuli (onset and offset distractors).
  • Employed two tasks: a keypress task and a goal-directed aiming task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated stimulus characteristics and response demands to probe attentional capture.

    • Main Results:

    • Offset distractors interfered with onset targets in a keypress task but not in an aiming task.
    • Onset distractors interfered with offset targets in both keypress and aiming tasks.
    • Interference patterns varied based on the interplay between stimulus properties and task demands.

    Conclusions:

    • The action system modulates attentional capture based on task-specific response expectations.
    • Attentional set is dynamically adjusted by the interaction between stimulus features and expected actions.
    • Findings highlight the integrated nature of perception, attention, and action.