Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2026

Vegetated Treatment Systems for Removing Contaminants Associated with Surface Water Toxicity in Agriculture and Urban Runoff
Published on: May 15, 2017
Managing biosolids runoff phosphorus using buffer strips enhanced with drinking water treatment residuals
D J Wagner1, H A Elliott, R C Brandt
1Agricultural and Biological Engineering Dep., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) did not significantly reduce phosphorus runoff from agricultural fields. Insufficient contact time between WTRs and runoff in buffer strips limited their effectiveness in preventing phosphorus loss to surface waters.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Soil Science
- Water Quality Management
Background:
- Vegetated buffer strips have limited effectiveness in reducing dissolved phosphorus (DP) delivery to surface waters from agricultural sources.
- Biosolids application to agricultural fields can lead to significant phosphorus (P) runoff due to high water-extractable P content.
- Drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) are a potential amendment for improving P sorption in buffer systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of buffer strips enhanced with drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) in mitigating phosphorus runoff from surface-applied biosolids.
- To determine if WTR application to vegetated buffers can reduce total phosphorus (TP) and dissolved phosphorus (DP) losses in runoff.
- To investigate the influence of runoff residence time and WTR-biosolid interaction on phosphorus removal.
Main Methods:
- A field study using simulated rainfall (62.4 mm h(-1)) on grassed plots with and without WTR-amended buffer strips.
- Surface application of biosolids (102 kg P ha(-1)) followed by collection of runoff for 30 minutes.
- Analysis of total phosphorus (TP) and total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) concentrations in runoff.
- Assessment of WTR P sorption capacity (Langmuir P maxima) and kinetic experiments.
Main Results:
- WTR-enhanced buffer strips (20 Mg ha(-1)) did not significantly reduce TP (2.5 mg L(-1)) or TDP (1.9 mg L(-1)) in runoff compared to unamended buffers (TP = 2.7 mg L(-1); TDP = 2.6 mg L(-1)).
- Despite WTRs having a high P sorption capacity (25 g P kg(-1)), the short runoff residence time (approx. 30 s) across the buffer limited P reduction.
- The applied WTR was theoretically capable of sorbing all the P in the runoff, indicating kinetics and contact time were limiting factors.
Conclusions:
- Top-dressing WTRs onto buffer strips is insufficient to significantly reduce phosphorus runoff when runoff residence time is limited.
- Effective dissolved phosphorus interception by WTR-enhanced buffers requires rapid P sorption kinetics and sufficient contact time between WTR and runoff.
- Incorporating WTRs into P-enriched soils or blending them with P sources may enhance phosphate-adsorbent contact and improve P retention.
Related Concept Videos
Microbial Wastewater Treatment
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water
Factors Affecting Solubility
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Bioreactor Design and Operational System
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms

