Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Orthopaedic training worldwide: how they compare? A pilot study.

Harish V Kurup¹, Steve Sarasin

¹Department of Orthopaedics, Mayday University Hospital, Croydon CR7 7YE, UK. harishvk@yahoo.com

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

|July 3, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Simple foot holder saves your theatre practitioner's back: a technical tip.

Journal of perioperative practice·2018

Same author

Painful sesamoid of the great toe.

World journal of orthopedics·2014

Same author

Sugioka transtrochanteric valgus osteotomy for hinge abduction in children.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics·2011

Same author

Residual clubfoot in children.

Foot and ankle clinics·2010

Same author

Secondary prevention of osteoporosis after Colles fracture: Current practice.

Joint bone spine·2007

Same author

Auditing the audits: are we missing the point?

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2007

Orthopaedic training programs worldwide show significant variation in structure, duration, and environment. Regular review and restructuring are essential to keep pace with advancements in orthopaedics for the benefit of all stakeholders.

Area of Science:

Orthopaedic Surgery
Medical Education

Background:

Orthopaedic training programs require periodic review and restructuring to incorporate advancements in the field.
Many existing orthopaedic training programs have remained unchanged for decades, with limited global comparative data available.
There is a need to understand the current landscape of global orthopaedic training.

Purpose of the Study:

To gather and compare information on orthopaedic training programs across various countries.
To identify variations in training structures, duration, and environments globally.

Main Methods:

A survey questionnaire was distributed to orthopaedic trainees and trainers in G8 countries and the ten most populous nations.
Responses were collected and tabulated for comprehensive analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

Significant variations were observed in the structure of orthopaedic training programs worldwide.
Differences in the duration of training and the training environment were also evident across countries.

Conclusions:

Continuous monitoring of global orthopaedic training programs is necessary to adapt to evolving medical knowledge and practices.
Standardizing or improving training programs can mutually benefit trainees, trainers, and patient populations globally.