Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Comet Assay to Quantify DNA Damage in FLT3 Mutant-expressing 32D Cells after Exposure to Type I and Type II FLT3 Inhibitors
Published on: October 17, 2025
Imatinib-resistant CML cells have low ENT activity but maintain sensitivity to gemcitabine
Andrea V Leisewitz1, Eric I Zimmerman, Shannon Z Jones
1Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Abstract:
Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenus leukemia (CML) is widely treated with imatinib mesylate (imatinib), a potent inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase. However, resistance to this compound remains a concern. Current treatment approaches include combinations of imatinib with nucleoside analogs such as gemcitabine, which requires equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) for uptake, to overcome this resistance. Here we report that imatinib treatment decreased ENT1-dependent activity and mRNA expression. Although, imatinib-resistant cells showed decreased levels of both ENT1 and ENT2 activity and expression, these cells remained sensitive to gemcitabine, suggesting that nucleoside analogs can be used as adjunctive therapy.
Insights
Imatinib treatment reduces nucleoside transporter activity in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells. However, gemcitabine remains effective, suggesting nucleoside analogs can be used alongside imatinib to overcome resistance.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is primarily treated with imatinib, a Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
- Resistance to imatinib is a significant clinical challenge in CML treatment.
- Nucleoside analogs like gemcitabine are explored as combination therapies, requiring equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) for cellular uptake.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of imatinib treatment on equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) expression and activity in CML cells.
- To determine the sensitivity of imatinib-resistant CML cells to gemcitabine.
- To evaluate the potential of nucleoside analogs as adjunctive therapy for imatinib-resistant CML.
Main Methods:
- Assessing ENT1-dependent activity and mRNA expression following imatinib treatment.
- Analyzing ENT1 and ENT2 activity and expression in imatinib-resistant CML cell lines.
- Evaluating gemcitabine sensitivity in imatinib-resistant CML cells.
Main Results:
- Imatinib treatment led to decreased ENT1 activity and mRNA expression.
- Imatinib-resistant CML cells exhibited reduced levels of both ENT1 and ENT2 activity and expression.
- Despite decreased ENT expression, imatinib-resistant cells remained sensitive to gemcitabine.
Conclusions:
- Imatinib therapy negatively affects ENT1-mediated nucleoside uptake.
- Nucleoside analogs like gemcitabine retain efficacy in imatinib-resistant CML cells.
- Nucleoside analogs represent a viable adjunctive therapeutic strategy for overcoming imatinib resistance in CML.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Maintenance
Cancer stem cells are thought to originate from tissue-specific normal stem cells or progenitor cells. The normal stem cells usually reside in...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
