Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response mode differences in perspective taking: differences in representation or differences in retrieval?

Jonathan W Kelly1, Timothy P McNamara

  • 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. jonathan.kelly@vanderbilt.edu

Memory & Cognition
|July 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mental Representations of Impossible Non-Euclidean Environments.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Collaborative Navigation Improves Spatial Learning Across Symmetric and Asymmetric Locomotion in Virtual Reality.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Cybersickness Abatement From Repeated Exposure Generalizes Across Experiences.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Processing spatial cue conflict in navigation: Distance estimation.

Cognitive psychology·2025
Same author

An examination of scene complexity's role in cybersickness.

Ergonomics·2024
Same author

Cybersickness Abatement From Repeated Exposure to VR With Reduced Discomfort.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2024
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Perspective taking relies on retrieval processes, not spatial memory organization. Response modes like pointing or verbalizing are influenced by strategy and context, impacting spatial recall accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Spatial Cognition
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Perspective-taking abilities are crucial for navigation and social interaction.
  • Previous research suggests potential differences in spatial representations or retrieval processes underlying various response modes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether response mode differences in perspective taking stem from distinct spatial representations or varied retrieval processes.
  • To examine the influence of body alignment and learning perspective on pointing and verbal responses.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments involved participants learning object locations and then recalling them via pointing or verbal description.
  • Testing involved perspectives aligned or misaligned with the participant's body and the original learning perspective.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response modes were manipulated, including verbal responses with and without a pointing context, and strategy instructions.

    • Main Results:

    • Pointing responses were facilitated by body-aligned perspectives, showing less sensitivity to context or strategy.
    • Verbal responses showed body-alignment facilitation only when preceded by pointing, diminishing with independent verbalization or third-person strategy instructions.
    • Performance was consistently enhanced when recalling from the original learning perspective, irrespective of response mode.

    Conclusions:

    • Response mode differences in perspective taking are primarily driven by variations in retrieval processes, which are influenced by strategy and context.
    • The underlying spatial memory organization appears consistent across different response modes.
    • Strategic choices and contextual cues significantly modulate the retrieval of spatial information depending on the response modality.