Response mode differences in perspective taking: differences in representation or differences in retrieval?
Jonathan W Kelly1, Timothy P McNamara
1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. jonathan.kelly@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract:
Three experiments explored whether response mode differences in perspective taking result from different spatial representations or different retrieval processes. Participants learned object locations and then, while blindfolded, pointed to or verbally described object locations from perspectives aligned or misaligned with their facing direction and aligned or misaligned with the learning perspective. Pointing was facilitated from the perspective aligned with the body during testing. Similar facilitation occurred when verbally labeling, but only when conducted in the context of pointing (e.g., after pointing). Without this pointing context, or after third-person strategy instructions, the effect of body alignment was eliminated for verbal responses. Pointing was less responsive to context and strategy. Across all conditions, performance was facilitated for the learning perspective. Taken together, these experiments indicate that response mode differences are due to differences in the retrieval process, which varies with strategy, rather than differences in the organization of the underlying spatial memory.
Related Concept Videos
Actor-Observer Effect
Correspondence Bias
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Empathy
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Framing Effects


