Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
Published on: June 18, 2018
Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses
Andrew C Butler1, Jeffrey D Karpicke, Henry L Roediger
1Department of Psychology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63139-4899, USA. butler@wustl.edu
Abstract:
Previous studies investigating posttest feedback have generally conceptualized feedback as a method for correcting erroneous responses, giving virtually no consideration to how feedback might promote learning of correct responses. Here, the authors show that when correct responses are made with low confidence, feedback serves to correct this initial metacognitive error, enhancing retention of low-confidence correct responses. In 2 experiments, subjects took an initial multiple-choice test on general knowledge facts and made a confidence judgment after each response. Feedback was provided for half of the questions, and retention was assessed by a final cued-recall test. Taking the initial test improved retention relative to not testing, and feedback further enhanced performance. Consistent with prior research, feedback improved retention by allowing subjects to correct initially erroneous responses. Of more importance, feedback also doubled the retention of correct low-confidence responses, relative to providing no feedback. The function of feedback is to correct both memory errors and metacognitive errors.
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
Hindsight Biases
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

