Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Short-term mortality and cost associated with cardiac device implantation in patients hospitalized with heart failure
Jason Swindle1, Thomas E Burroughs, Mark A Schnitzler
1Center for Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Insights
Implanting cardiac devices in heart failure patients increases mortality risk, especially if they need intravenous vasoactive therapy. Careful patient selection is crucial for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Device Technology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Increasing use of implantable cardiac devices for heart failure management.
- Limited exploration of patient selection and in-hospital outcomes in clinical practice.
- Need to critically evaluate outcomes associated with device implantation in heart failure patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate in-hospital mortality and costs in heart failure patients undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation.
- To identify factors influencing in-hospital outcomes in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 27,907 hospitalizations using ICD/CRT procedure codes and heart failure diagnoses (2004-2005).
- Calculation of odds ratios to quantify mortality risk.
- Assessment of accumulated costs before and after device implantation.
Main Results:
- In-hospital mortality varied significantly based on the timing of device implantation and use of intravenous inotropic therapy.
- Mortality rates were substantially higher for patients requiring inotropic drugs (3.3%–15.2%) compared to those who did not (0.3%).
- Use of inotropic drugs was the strongest predictor of in-hospital mortality; similar trends observed with vasoactive therapy. Costs increased markedly.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac device implantation during heart failure hospitalization is linked to significant in-hospital mortality, particularly in patients requiring intravenous vasoactive therapy.
- Risk stratification incorporating the need for vasoactive drugs can enhance clinical decision-making for device implantation.
- Improved patient selection strategies are needed to mitigate risks associated with device implantation in heart failure.
Background:
The use of implantable cardiac devices in the management of heart failure has increased, but patient selection and inhospital outcomes in clinical practice have not been critically explored. Therefore, we evaluated the inhospital mortality and costs associated with patients with heart failure who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization device, or device lead.
Methods:
We analyzed admissions with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes for implantation/revision of cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization device and a primary or secondary diagnosis code for heart failure in a prospective hospital database from 2004 to 2005. Odds ratios were calculated to quantify risk for mortality. Average accumulated costs over time were calculated before and after day of first device implant procedure.
Results:
Among 27,907 hospitalizations, inhospital mortality varied based on day of device implantation and use of intravenous inotropic therapy. Mortality was 0.3% for patients who did not require inotropic drugs versus 3.3%, 6.6%, and 15.2% for patients who required initiation of drug before, on the day of, or after device implantation, respectively. Logistic regression demonstrated that the most potent risk for inhospital mortality was the use of inotropic drugs. Similar trends were observed for any vasoactive therapy. There was a marked increase in costs associated with these admissions.
Conclusions:
Implantation of cardiac devices during a hospitalization for heart failure may be associated with significant inhospital mortality if patients require intravenous vasoactive therapy. Risk stratification methodology that incorporates ongoing/anticipated need for these drugs will likely improve clinical decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization

