Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Sclerosis l: Introduction01:19

Multiple Sclerosis l: Introduction

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that affects the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves. It is an inflammatory demyelinating disorder and a leading cause of neurological disability in young adults.EpidemiologyMS commonly begins between 20 and 40 years of age and is twice as common in women. Its exact cause remains unclear, but genetic susceptibility contributes, with higher risk in first-degree relatives and identical twins. A greater...
Parkinson Disease ll: Pathophysiology01:24

Parkinson Disease ll: Pathophysiology

Parkinson disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder primarily affecting movement, with additional non-motor features. Its pathophysiology involves complex interactions among genetic susceptibility, environmental exposures, and cellular dysfunction, including dopaminergic neuron loss, protein aggregation, and mitochondrial impairment.Selective NeurodegenerationA key feature is the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, leading to reduced...
Parkinson's Disease: Overview01:15

Parkinson's Disease: Overview

Neurodegenerative disorders are progressive diseases that cause irreversible damage and loss to neurons in specific brain areas. Examples of these disorders include Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). These disorders share characteristics such as proteinopathies, selective neuronal vulnerability, and a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors. The primary therapeutic goal for these conditions is to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Assessing Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Using a Patient-Reported Disability Measure and Self-Administered Neuroperformance Outcomes.

Annals of neurology·2026
Same author

Chronological ageing and ovarian reserve in MS: insights from anti-Müllerian hormone and disability progression.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same author

Redefining Multiple Sclerosis: Toward a Biologically Driven Diagnosis.

Neurology·2026
Same author

Spider-MS: an individualized polyhedral prediction of multiple sclerosis prognosis.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2026
Same author

An automated quantitative report for multiple sclerosis using only 3D T2-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI.

Neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Comprehensive Review.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Will Rogers phenomenon in multiple sclerosis.

Maria Pia Sormani1, Mar Tintorè, Marco Rovaris

  • 1Biostatistics Unit, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Italy.

Annals of Neurology
|August 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS) impact prognosis staging, not the overall disease course. This "Will Rogers phenomenon" necessitates caution when using historical controls in MS treatment trials.

More Related Videos

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
09:41

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: July 19, 2019

Modeling Multiple Sclerosis in the Two Sexes: MOG35-55-Induced Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
05:44

Modeling Multiple Sclerosis in the Two Sexes: MOG35-55-Induced Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

Published on: October 13, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
09:41

Comprehensive Autopsy Program for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis

Published on: July 19, 2019

Modeling Multiple Sclerosis in the Two Sexes: MOG35-55-Induced Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
05:44

Modeling Multiple Sclerosis in the Two Sexes: MOG35-55-Induced Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis

Published on: October 13, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Epidemiology

Background:

  • The
  • Will Rogers phenomenon
  • describes how changes in classification criteria can alter stage-specific prognoses without affecting the overall disease trajectory.
  • This phenomenon poses challenges for using historical controls in clinical trials.
  • Its impact on multiple sclerosis (MS) prognosis under varying diagnostic criteria is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate whether the
  • Will Rogers phenomenon
  • influences the prognosis of patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS when different diagnostic criteria are applied.
  • To assess the implications for using historical controls in MS research.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 309 patients with CIS suggestive of MS was followed for a median of 84 months.
  • Patients were classified as CIS or having evolved to MS after 1 year using both Poser and McDonald criteria.
  • Prognosis was determined by the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of ≥3.0.

Main Results:

  • After 1 year, 16% of patients met MS criteria (Poser) versus 44% (McDonald).
  • At median follow-up, the probability of reaching EDSS ≥3.0 was lower in McDonald-classified MS patients (27%) compared to Poser-classified (46%).
  • Patients with discordant diagnoses showed intermediate prognoses, worse than CIS but better than MS by both criteria.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of diagnostic criteria significantly alters the apparent medium-term prognosis of MS.
  • This effect, the
  • Will Rogers phenomenon
  • , can create spurious improvements in prognosis.
  • Extreme caution is advised when employing historical controls in MS clinical trials due to potential criterion-induced biases.