Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

07:56
A Standardized Method for Measurement of Elbow Kinesthesia
Published on: October 10, 2020
Correspondence between perceived disability and objective physical impairment after elbow trauma
Anneluuk L C Lindenhovius1, Geert A Buijze, Peter Kloen
1Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
|October 3, 2008
Summary
Pain significantly impacts perceived arm disability more than objective elbow motion loss. Understanding this difference is key for effective rehabilitation after elbow trauma.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Pain Management
Background:
- Disability and impairment often show significant discrepancies, with psychosocial factors like pain playing a crucial role.
- Pain is a more significant determinant of perceived arm disability than objective elbow impairment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between objective elbow impairment and perceived task-specific disability.
- To test if objective loss of elbow motion predicts perceived elbow-related disability better than pain.
Main Methods:
- 158 patients with traumatic elbow injuries were assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.
- Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated predictors of total DASH scores and specific item scores related to elbow function.
Main Results:
- Elbow motion explained 35% of total DASH score variability and 24-33% for elbow-dependent tasks.
- Pain explained 41% of total DASH score variability and was a stronger predictor for tasks like opening jars and pushing doors.
- Multivariate models explained a maximum of 53% of DASH score variability.
Conclusions:
- Objective elbow impairment correlates with self-reported disability for specific tasks.
- A significant portion of perceived disability remains unexplained, highlighting the need for further research into impairment-disability differences.