Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Consecutive Reactions

Consecutive Reactions

Consecutive reactions involve a sequence where the product of a preceding reaction becomes the reactant for the subsequent one. In a simple scheme, A transforms into B, which further reacts to form C, with rate constants k1 and k2, respectively. This concept is evident in the radioactive decay series. Assuming an initial state with only A present, the conservation of matter leads to three coupled differential equations, determining the concentrations of A, B, and C over time.The rate of change...

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Data from the Efficacy Study of From Here to There! A Dynamic Technology for Improving Algebraic Understanding.

Journal of open psychology data·2025

Same author

Likely Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Newborn Hearing Screening and Follow-up Services in the United States in 2020.

Journal of early hearing detection and intervention·2024

Same author

Assessing Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Receipt and Timeliness of Newborn Hearing Screening and Diagnostic Services Among Infants Born in Four States.

Journal of early hearing detection and intervention·2024

Same author

The Impacts of Three Educational Technologies on Algebraic Understanding in the Context of COVID-19.

AERA open·2023

Same author

Frequency of Early Intervention Sessions and Vocabulary Skills in Children with Hearing Loss.

Journal of clinical medicine·2021

Same author

Reading Proficiency Trends Following Newborn Hearing Screening Implementation.

Pediatrics·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Partitioning the population attributable fraction for a sequential chain of effects.

Craig A Mason¹, Shihfen Tu

¹College of Education and Human Development, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA. craig.mason@umit.maine.edu

Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations : EP+I

|October 4, 2008

Summary

A new method partitions the population attributable fraction (PAF) for multiple risk factors, offering clearer insights into community health effects, even with correlated factors or interactions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Public Health

Background:

Current methods for estimating population attributable fraction (PAF) in multiple risk factor models have significant limitations.
Existing strategies can yield paradoxical or ambiguous effect measures and require unrealistic assumptions.
Estimating the community-level impact of risk factors using PAF is crucial but challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose and demonstrate a novel method for partitioning the total population attributable fraction (PAF) across multiple risk factors.
To provide a clear and interpretable approach for assessing the impact of risk factors in complex models.
To address and quantify the influence of population shifts on population-level effects.

Main Methods:

A sequential ordering of effects is used to partition the overall population attributable fraction (PAF).
The proposed method is applied to several hypothetical datasets to illustrate its application.
The approach facilitates statistical control for confounding variables.

Main Results:

The sequentially partitioned PAF method provides clear and interpretable measures of effect, even with correlated or interacting risk factors.
The strategy quantifies the impact of population shifts on population-level effects.
The method avoids pitfalls associated with differentiating direct and indirect effects.

Conclusions:

Sequentially partitioned PAF, alongside simple and aggregate PAF estimates, offers valuable insights into disease process impacts.
This approach enhances understanding of how population rates of disorders are affected by multiple risk factors.
The method provides a robust way to manage confounding in epidemiological studies.