Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 29, 2026

06:36
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Evaluation of mandibular posterior single implants with two different surfaces: a 5-year comparative study.
Ui-Won Jung1, Jung-Yoo Choi, Chang-Sung Kim
1Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
Journal of Periodontology
|October 7, 2008
Summary
Mandibular posterior single implants demonstrate high survival rates, offering an effective tooth replacement option. Implant surface treatment, position, length, and diameter did not significantly impact outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Oral Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Anatomic and biomechanical challenges in the mandibular posterior region can compromise single implant success.
- Implant fixture design and surface modifications aim to enhance osseointegration and long-term stability.
- This study investigates the efficacy of two implant surface treatments in the mandibular molar area.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cumulative survival rate (CSR) of sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) and anodized (ANO) single implants in the mandibular molar region.
- To identify factors influencing the success of these implants, including surface treatment, position, length, and diameter.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 193 SLA and 112 ANO single implants placed in the mandibular molar area between 2001 and 2006.
- Life-table analysis was used to calculate 1- to 6-year CSR for both implant groups.
- Chi-squared tests were employed to compare associated factors like surface treatment, position, and dimensions.
Main Results:
- The SLA group achieved a CSR of 98.96% (2 failures out of 193 implants).
- The ANO group demonstrated a CSR of 96.43% (4 failures out of 112 implants).
- No statistically significant differences were found concerning surface treatment, implant position, length, or diameter.
Conclusions:
- Mandibular posterior single implants exhibit a high CSR, proving to be a reliable treatment modality.
- The success of these implants is not significantly affected by surface treatment, position, length, or diameter.
- Single implants are an effective option for replacing mandibular molars despite anatomical limitations.

