Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Statistical Analysis System (SAS)01:14

Statistical Analysis System (SAS)

SAS, short for Statistical Analysis System, is a powerful data analysis, management, and visualization tool. Developed by the SAS Institute in the early 1970s, SAS has evolved into a comprehensive software suite used across various industries for statistical analysis, business intelligence, and predictive modeling.
Applications: SAS finds applications in numerous fields, including healthcare for clinical trial analysis, finance for risk assessment, marketing for customer data analysis, and...
MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry01:19

MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry is a powerful characterization technique that can identify and separate a wide variety of compounds ranging from chemical to biological entities, based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z). The instruments that allow this detection, known as mass spectrometers, have three components: an ion source, a mass analyzer, and a detector. These spectrometers differ based on the nature of their ion source and analyzers.Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is a commonly...
Overview of Minitab01:11

Overview of Minitab

Minitab is a statistical software package designed for data analysis. With its origins in the 1970s and development at Pennsylvania State University, Minitab has grown significantly in its capabilities and applications. It plays a crucial role in quality management projects, especially in Six Sigma initiatives, by offering tools for process improvement and statistical analysis. Minitab's significance lies in its user-friendly interface, making complex statistical analysis accessible to users...
Mass Analyzers: Overview01:13

Mass Analyzers: Overview

The mass analyzer is a crucial component of the mass spectrometer. In the ionization chamber, the vaporized sample is bombarded with a high-energy electron beam to generate a radical cation and further fragment into neutral molecules, radicals, and cations. A series of negatively charged accelerator plates accelerate the cations into the mass analyzer. The mass analyzer separates ions according to their mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios and then directs them to the detector. The common types of mass...
Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:21

Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Tandem mass spectrometry is a technique that uses multiple mass analyzers in series to obtain a higher selectivity and reduce chemical noise during analyte detection. Instruments with multiple analyzers separated by an interaction cell enable secondary fragmentation and selected study of the fragment ions.Secondary fragmentations occur in the interaction cell and can be induced by various factors. Fragmentation induced by collision with inert gases, such as N2, Ar, He, etc., is called...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contribution to COVID-19 spread modelling: a physical phenomenological dissipative formalism.

Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology·2020
Same author

A comparison of four pair-wise sequence alignment methods.

Bioinformation·2011
Same author

Partitioning clustering algorithms for protein sequence data sets.

BioData mining·2009
Same journal

Assessment of lower incisor position and symphysis dimensions among different skeletal patterns in the Chhattisgarh population.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Low T3 syndrome and short-term outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A retrospective observational study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular risk prevention awareness and practices in type 2 diabetes: Linking HbA1c and lipid levels.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Assessment of periodontal condition using basic periodontal examination scores: A retrospective clinical study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of osseointegration among different surface modification techniques in dental implants.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Micro-osteoperforations' impact on orthodontic tooth movement rate: Split mouth research.

Bioinformation·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling (SAHM)
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling (SAHM)

Published on: October 11, 2016

A comparison of MSA tools.

Nadia Essoussi1, Khaddouja Boujenfa, Mohamed Limam

  • 1LARODEC, High Institute of Management, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

Bioinformation
|October 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) tools are crucial for phylogenetic analysis. This study found no single MSA tool consistently yields the most reliable phylogenetic trees across different datasets.

Keywords:
Neighbor-Joining methodRobinson-Foulds distancemultiple sequence alignment methodsphylogenetic trees

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 29, 2026

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling (SAHM)
12:26

Integrating Remote Sensing with Species Distribution Models; Mapping Tamarisk Invasions Using the Software for Assisted Habitat Modeling (SAHM)

Published on: October 11, 2016

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a fundamental technique in bioinformatics.
  • Accurate MSA is critical for downstream analyses like phylogenetic tree construction.
  • Numerous MSA tools exist, but their comparative performance in phylogenetic accuracy is not fully elucidated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comparatively analyze the performance of various popular MSA tools.
  • To evaluate the reliability of phylogenetic trees generated by different MSA methods.
  • To identify potential biases or limitations of specific MSA tools in phylogenetic inference.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized eight diverse MSA tools: ClustalX, Align-m, T-Coffee, SAGA, ProbCons, MAFFT, MUSCLE, and DIALIGN.
  • Applied these tools to two distinct biological datasets.
  • Constructed and compared phylogenetic trees derived from the alignments generated by each tool.

Main Results:

  • Significant variation in phylogenetic tree topology was observed among the tested MSA tools.
  • No single MSA tool demonstrated consistent superiority in producing reliable phylogenetic trees across both datasets.
  • The choice of MSA tool can impact the resulting phylogenetic inference.

Conclusions:

  • The selection of an appropriate MSA tool is critical for accurate phylogenetic analysis.
  • Researchers should be aware that different MSA tools may yield different phylogenetic outcomes.
  • Further investigation into tool-specific performance across various data types is warranted.