Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

06:13
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
[Rhinoplasty--five years retrospective analysis].
Vladimir Kljajić1, Slobodan Savović, Karol Canji
1Klinicki centar Vojvodine, Klinika za bolesti uva, grla i nosa, 21000 Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 1-7. kljaja@Eunet.yu
Medicinski Pregled
|October 18, 2008
Summary
Rhinoplasty surgery, often driven by patient desires for deviated septum or nasal pyramid correction, had a 5.34% complication rate and 3.29% reoperation rate in this study.
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Plastic Surgery
- Facial Surgery
Context:
- Rhinoplasty is a common surgical procedure influenced by both medical necessity and patient aesthetic preferences.
- Deviated septum and nasal pyramid deviation are frequent indications for rhinoplasty.
- Published complication and revision rates for rhinoplasty vary widely.
Purpose:
- To retrospectively analyze the outcomes of rhinoplasty procedures performed over a 5-year period.
- To determine the incidence of postoperative complications and the need for revision surgery.
- To evaluate patient satisfaction and objective results following rhinoplasty.
Summary:
- A 5-year retrospective study of 243 rhinoplasty patients (mean age 24) found that 81.1% had septal or nasal pyramid deviation, while 18.9% sought aesthetic improvement.
- The study recorded a 5.34% complication rate, including transient issues and 3 cases of nasal septum perforation.
- A 3.29% reoperation rate was observed due to patient dissatisfaction or suboptimal results, with some patients undergoing successful revisions.
Impact:
- This study provides valuable data on the complication and revision rates associated with rhinoplasty, particularly in a population with a high prevalence of septal and nasal pyramid deviations.
- Findings can inform patient expectations and surgical planning for rhinoplasty procedures.
- The results highlight the importance of addressing both functional and aesthetic concerns in rhinoplasty to minimize the need for revision surgery.
