Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coarsening in the persistent voter model: Analytical results.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Anomalous behavior of replicator dynamics for the prisoner's dilemma on diluted lattices.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Opinion inertia and coarsening in the persistent voter model.

Physical review. E·2024
Same author

Lotka-Volterra model with Allee effect: equilibria, coexistence and size scaling of maximum and minimum abundance.

Journal of mathematical biology·2023
Same author

Emergent cooperative behavior in transient compartments.

Physical review. E·2023
Same author

Heterogeneous contributions can jeopardize cooperation in the public goods game.

Physical review. E·2023
Same journal

Evolution of quantitative traits: exploring the ecological, social and genetic bases of adaptive polymorphism.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

The male-biased sex ratio in humans and its role in the transition from promiscuity to pair bonding.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Quantifying the counter-intuitive effects of vaccination by coupling the transmission dynamics of COVID-19 and the evolution of human behaviors.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

An integrative model of FGF2-induced signaling and muscle cell proliferation.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

A hybrid reaction-diffusion and mechanical stimulus model for mandibular bone remodeling under chewing and vibratory loading.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
Same journal

Integrated tick management strategies in fragmented peridomestic environments.

Journal of theoretical biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

Random mobility and spatial structure often enhance cooperation.

Estrella A Sicardi1, Hugo Fort, Mendeli H Vainstein

  • 1Facultad de Ciencias, Instituto de Física, Universidad de la República, Iguá, Montevideo, Uruguay.

Journal of Theoretical Biology
|October 28, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adding mobility to spatial games like Prisoner's Dilemma and Snowdrift can boost cooperation. This strategy overcomes spatial structures that often hinder collaboration, promoting better outcomes in these strategic interactions.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms
08:00

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations
07:40

Monitoring Spatial Segregation in Surface Colonizing Microbial Populations

Published on: October 29, 2016

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms
08:00

Analyzing Spatial Learning and Prosocial Behavior in Mice Using the Barnes Maze and Damsel-in-Distress Paradigms

Published on: November 17, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Game Theory
  • Computational Social Science
  • Agent-Based Modeling

Background:

  • Spatial structure influences cooperation in game theory, often yielding different outcomes than mixed populations.
  • Cooperation levels can be either promoted or inhibited by spatial arrangements.
  • Understanding these dynamics is crucial for modeling social behaviors and strategic interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of an unconditional move rule on cooperation in spatial Prisoner's Dilemma, Snowdrift, and Stag Hunt games.
  • To determine if random dilution and mobility can mitigate the negative effects of spatial structure on cooperation.
  • To enhance the understanding of how mobility affects cooperative strategies in structured populations.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations of spatial game theory models.
  • Introduction of an unconditional move rule incorporating random dilution and mobility.
  • Analysis of cooperation levels across different game types (Prisoner's Dilemma, Snowdrift, Stag Hunt) under varying spatial conditions.

Main Results:

  • Random dilution and mobility were found to suppress inhibiting factors of spatial structure in the Snowdrift game.
  • Mobility enhanced cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma and Stag Hunt games.
  • The unconditional move rule demonstrated a significant impact on cooperation dynamics across all studied games.

Conclusions:

  • Mobility, through an unconditional move rule, can be a key factor in promoting cooperation in spatial game theory.
  • This strategy offers a mechanism to overcome spatial constraints that typically inhibit cooperative behaviors.
  • Findings have implications for understanding cooperation in various biological and social systems where spatial structure and movement are relevant.