Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 28, 2026

08:44
Assessing Spatial Learning and Memory in Small Squamate Reptiles
Published on: January 3, 2017
Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.
1Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom. p.wilson@hull.ac.uk
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|November 5, 2008
Summary
Spatial learning in virtual environments shows reciprocal blocking between enclosure shape and landmarks. Enclosure shape was a stronger blocking cue than landmarks, suggesting cue-interaction effects in spatial navigation.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Virtual Reality Research
Background:
- Spatial learning involves acquiring knowledge about the environment to navigate and locate targets.
- Landmarks and enclosure boundaries are crucial cues for spatial orientation.
- Cue-interaction effects, where learning about one cue affects learning about another, are well-documented in associative learning but less studied in spatial learning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate reciprocal cue-interaction effects in human spatial learning within a virtual environment.
- To determine the relative influence of enclosure shape versus local landmarks as blocking cues.
- To explore the impact of landmark salience on spatial learning and cue interaction.
Main Methods:
- Participants learned to locate an invisible target in a virtual environment.
- A blocking paradigm was employed, where learning about one cue (enclosure shape or landmark) was manipulated to assess its effect on learning about the other.
- The physical salience of the landmark was varied to test its influence on blocking effects.
Main Results:
- Reciprocal blocking was observed between the enclosure shape and the local landmark.
- The enclosure shape acted as a significantly stronger blocking cue than the landmark.
- Increasing the landmark's physical salience did not alter the degree to which it blocked enclosure-shape learning.
Conclusions:
- Cue-interaction effects, similar to those in contingency learning, are present in human spatial learning involving enclosure walls and landmarks.
- Spatial reference frames are important for understanding how different environmental cues are integrated during navigation.
- The findings suggest a hierarchical or differential weighting of environmental cues in spatial memory and navigation.

