Renal tumor natural history: the rationale and role for active surveillance

Michael A S Jewett1, Alvaro Zuniga

  • 1Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital and the University Health Network, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, 3-124, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4. m.jewett@utoronto.ca

Insights

Active surveillance for small renal masses (SRMs) may be a viable option for selected patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This approach could reduce treatment burden and healthcare costs.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Nephrology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common kidney cancer.
  • Despite advancements in treatment, RCC mortality rates remain high.
  • Increased abdominal imaging leads to more incidental diagnoses of small renal masses (SRMs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the potential benefits of active surveillance for SRMs.
  • To determine if delayed treatment for selected patients can decrease overall treatment burden and costs.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on small renal masses and renal cell carcinoma.
  • Analysis of tumor growth patterns and progression risk for SRMs.
  • Assessment of treatment outcomes and cost-effectiveness of active surveillance versus immediate intervention.

Main Results:

  • Small renal masses (SRMs) that are renal cell carcinoma (RCC) often exhibit slow growth.
  • Many SRMs have a low risk of early progression.
  • Active surveillance may be suitable for selected patients, potentially reducing overtreatment.

Conclusions:

  • Active surveillance for selected patients with small renal masses (SRMs) is a potential strategy.
  • This approach may lead to a reduced treatment burden and significant cost savings in managing renal cell carcinoma (RCC).