Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Gaussian Elimination: Problem Solving01:30

Gaussian Elimination: Problem Solving

Systems of linear equations in several variables are pivotal in modeling complex scenarios involving multiple unknowns and constraints. Such systems are widely used in various fields to represent relationships where several conditions must be simultaneously satisfied. Each variable in the system corresponds to an unknown quantity, while each equation imposes a linear constraint, leading to a structured approach for analyzing and solving real-world problems.A system of three equations with three...
Biot-Savart Law: Problem-Solving00:59

Biot-Savart Law: Problem-Solving

The magnitude and direction of a magnetic field created by a steady current can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law.
Consider a mobile phone battery bank as a source of steady current, which flows through the wire connected between the two. What is the magnitude of the magnetic field created by this current at a field point P?
To estimate the magnitude of the total magnetic field, we first consider a small current element of length dl, at a distance r from the field point. Now the following...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Strong and weak thermalization of infinite nonintegrable quantum systems.

Physical review letters·2011
Same author

Quantum adiabatic computation with a constant gap is not useful in one dimension.

Physical review letters·2009
Same author

Matrix product states for dynamical simulation of infinite chains.

Physical review letters·2009
Same author

Conformal invariance and stochastic Loewner evolution processes in two-dimensional Ising spin glasses.

Physical review letters·2007
Same author

Community detection as an inference problem.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2006
Same author

Lieb-Robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order.

Physical review letters·2006
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening
14:04

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: January 16, 2021

Inference from matrix products: a heuristic spin-glass algorithm.

M B Hastings1

  • 1Center for Nonlinear Studies and Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.

Physical Review Letters
|November 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new algorithm for finding ground states in two-dimensional spin-glass systems. The method offers accurate results with computational efficiency, outperforming traditional Monte Carlo schemes.

More Related Videos

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening
12:24

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: August 31, 2013

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 28, 2026

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening
14:04

Derivatization of Protein Crystals with I3C using Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: January 16, 2021

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening
12:24

Improving the Success Rate of Protein Crystallization by Random Microseed Matrix Screening

Published on: August 31, 2013

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Condensed matter physics
  • Quantum information theory
  • Computational physics

Background:

  • Spin-glass systems are complex magnetic materials with disordered interactions.
  • Finding the ground state (lowest energy configuration) is computationally challenging.
  • Existing methods like Monte Carlo can be time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel, efficient algorithm for determining the ground states of 2D spin-glass systems.
  • To assess the accuracy and scalability of the proposed algorithm.
  • To compare its performance against established computational techniques.

Main Methods:

  • The algorithm is based on matrix product states from quantum information theory.
  • It operates directly at zero temperature, approximating the system's energy.
  • Accuracy is controlled by a parameter 'k', which scales with system size.

Main Results:

  • The algorithm provides accurate ground state approximations for Ising models.
  • Required accuracy necessitates 'k' scaling polynomially with system size.
  • It performs well on systems with arbitrary interactions where exact algorithms are unavailable.

Conclusions:

  • The presented algorithm offers an efficient and accurate alternative for studying 2D spin-glass systems.
  • It demonstrates superior performance compared to Monte Carlo methods in terms of speed.
  • The approach shows promise for complex systems lacking fast, exact solutions.