Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison01:14

Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison

The acceptance criteria for dissolution profile data are anchored in Q values, representing the percentage of drug dissolved within a specified period. This assessment unfolds in three stages:First Stage: The test passes if all six drug dosage units are equal to or greater than Q plus 5%; otherwise, the sample proceeds to the second stage.Second Stage: The average of twelve units must be equal to or greater than Q, with no unit falling below Q - 15% to pass; if not, it progresses to the final...
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment01:29

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Delirium Diagnosis Timing Among Trauma and Acute Care Surgery Ward Patients.

Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses·2026
Same author

Reducing Unnecessary Laboratory Testing: A Quality Improvement Initiative at Wellstar Spalding Medical Center.

Southern medical journal·2024
Same author

Hepatic Artery Pseudoaneurysm Following Gunshot Injury With Early Rupture.

Cureus·2021
Same author

Lessons Learned From an Early Hotspot During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The American surgeon·2021
Same author

Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor-Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative / Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer.

Ochsner journal·2021
Same author

Impact of Launching A High-Risk Breast Cancer Screening Program Using the Tyrer-Cuzick Model.

The American surgeon·2020

Related Experiment Videos

Application submission date reflects applicant quality.

George M Fuhrman1, Stephen Dada, Carole Ehleben

  • 1Atlanta Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia 30312, USA. george.fuhrman@tenethealth.com

Journal of Surgical Education
|December 9, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Submission date for general surgery residency applications offers valuable screening insights. Early applicants with strong academic performance and higher United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores were more likely to secure interviews.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Surgical Residency Admissions
  • Graduate Medical Education

Background:

  • General surgery residency applications are submitted via the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) starting in early September.
  • Effective screening of applicants is crucial for residency programs to select suitable candidates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if the application submission date can be utilized as a screening tool for general surgery residency applicants.
  • To correlate application timing with applicant qualifications and interview selection.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 2007 ERAS data for a general surgery residency program accepting categorical residents.
  • Exclusion of international medical graduates and preliminary position applicants.
  • Evaluation of applicants based on United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, medical school performance (dean's letters, transcripts), personal statements, and letters of recommendation.
  • Comparison of application submission lag time with USMLE scores, academic performance, interview offers, and interview quality using ANOVA and Pearson correlation.

Main Results:

  • A total of 155 applications from LCME-accredited schools were analyzed.
  • Students with outstanding medical school performance submitted applications significantly earlier (15.2 days) than poorly performing students (37.4 days).
  • A negative correlation was observed between USMLE scores and application lag time (p < 0.01).
  • Applicants who received an interview invitation submitted their applications significantly earlier (19.2 days) than those not selected for an interview (34.0 days).

Conclusions:

  • Application submission date serves as a significant screening indicator for general surgery residency.
  • Early submission, particularly in September, is associated with higher academic performance and increased likelihood of interview selection.
  • Utilizing submission timing can help programs optimize their interview scheduling, potentially allowing candidates to attend more interviews.