Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Confidence in judgments of comparative, own, and average person's risk
1School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia.
Abstract:
Unrealistic optimism is often assessed using a single question asking people to estimate their own risk compared to that of the average person like them. However, it has been proposed that such estimates of comparative risk are based mainly just on estimates of own risk. In two studies (n=80 and n=65), students gave estimates of comparative, own, and average person's risk and rated their confidence in these estimates. Confidence was lower for estimates of average person's risk than for estimates of own and comparative risk, which were given with equal confidence. Results were in accord with the proposal that judgments of comparative risk derive principally from judgments of own risk.
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Coefficient
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Relative Risk
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Regression Toward the Mean
Confidence Intervals
A confidence...
