Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
Published on: August 2, 2019
Electronic transport in superlattice-structured ZnO Nanohelix
Pu-Xian Gao1, Yong Ding, Zhong Lin Wang
1Department of Chemical, Materials and Biomolecular Engineering & Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3136, USA. puxian.gao@ims.uconn.edu
Abstract:
Superlattice-structured ZnO nanohelix is a structure that is made of a coiling nanobelt, which is composed of ZnO nanostripes oriented alternatively in two different orientations (Science 2005, 309, 1700). The nanostripes run almost in parallel to the nanobelt direction but at an offset angle of approximately 5 degrees . We have measured the transport properties of a nanohelix and found its abnormal nonlinear characteristic. In comparison to the Ohmic transport property of a single crystal ZnO nanobelt measured under the same experimental conditions, the symmetric "Schottky-type" I-V property of the nanohelix is suggested due to nanostripe boundaries and surfaces, where built-in periodic back-to-back energy barriers might occur across the nanostripe interfaces as a result of polar charges and interface-strain-induced piezoelectric effect. The effective potential barrier across the nanostripe boundary is estimated to be approximately 24 meV. With the increasing of bias voltage, electrons can effectively tunnel through and thermionic emission across nanostripe boundaries, leading to a fast increase in transport current. It is suggested that the ZnO nanohelix could form a new type of band structure modulated superlattice for fabricating novel electronic devices.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects
Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge
The Electrical Double Layer
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

