Routine developmental screening implemented in urban primary care settings: more evidence of feasibility and

Alison Schonwald1, Noelle Huntington, Eugenia Chan

  • 1Divisions of Developmental Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA. alison.schonwald@childrens.harvard.edu

Pediatrics
|January 28, 2009
PubMed

Insights

Implementing the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDs) for developmental screening in urban pediatric practices proved feasible and effective. This approach successfully increased the identification of developmental and behavioral concerns in young children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric primary care
  • Developmental screening
  • Quality improvement initiatives

Background:

  • Early identification of developmental and behavioral concerns is crucial for timely intervention.
  • Validated screening tools are essential for accurate assessment in pediatric settings.
  • Urban primary care practices face unique challenges in implementing new screening protocols.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility of implementing the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDs) in urban pediatric practices.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of PEDs in identifying developmental and behavioral concerns.
  • To examine the impact of PEDs implementation on screening rates and referral patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of PEDs as a quality improvement initiative in two urban pediatric practices.
  • Screening offered to children aged 6 months to 8 years during well-child visits.
  • Pre/post-implementation surveys, focus groups with providers, and medical chart reviews of 2- and 3-year-olds.

Main Results:

  • Routine screening using PEDs was found to be feasible and easier than anticipated by providers.
  • Screening reached 61.6% of eligible children, with increased detection of behavioral concerns in 2-year-olds and developmental concerns in 3-year-olds.
  • Referral rates increased for 3-year-olds, with consistent referral types (audiology, early intervention).

Conclusions:

  • Validated developmental screening using PEDs is feasible in large, urban pediatric settings.
  • The implementation effectively increased the identification rates of developmental and behavioral concerns.
  • Potential obstacles, such as time constraints, should not hinder the widespread adoption of this screening tool.
Abstract