Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026
07:34
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Husserl and Heidegger: exploring the disparity.
Tracy McConnell-Henry1, Ysanne Chapman, Karen Francis
1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia. tracy.mcconnell-henry@med.monash.edu.au
International Journal of Nursing Practice
|February 4, 2009
Summary
Phenomenology provides a unique lens for nursing research on lived experiences. This article clarifies the differences between Husserl's and Heidegger's phenomenological approaches for novice researchers.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Research
- Qualitative Research Methods
- Philosophy of Science
Background:
- Phenomenology offers a valuable alternative to empirical science for understanding nursing phenomena.
- The diverse nature of phenomenological approaches can cause confusion for nursing researchers.
- Misalignment between research questions and chosen philosophical frameworks can occur.
Discussion:
- This article examines the distinctions between Husserl's transcendental phenomenology and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology.
- Nursing-specific examples are used to illustrate complex philosophical concepts.
- The goal is to simplify dense philosophical language for accessibility.
Key Insights:
- Understanding the core tenets of transcendental phenomenology (Husserl) and hermeneutic phenomenology (Heidegger) is crucial.
- Choosing the appropriate phenomenological framework enhances research rigor and epistemological alignment.
- Accessible explanations are vital for novice phenomenological researchers in nursing.
Outlook:
- Further clarification of different phenomenological schools will benefit nursing research methodology.
- Promoting a deeper understanding of philosophical underpinnings in qualitative research is essential.
- This work aims to empower novice researchers to confidently select and apply phenomenological methods.
Related Concept Videos
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
01:26Structuralism
Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...
01:21Gestalt Principles of Perception
Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...
01:29Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Self-discrepancy theory explains how people compare their actual self to their ideal and ought selves and how mismatches between these self-guides can lead to emotional distress. Developed by E. Tory Higgins, the theory distinguishes among three components of self-concept: the actual self, the ideal self, and the ought self. These refer respectively to how individuals perceive themselves, how they aspire to be, and how they believe they are obligated to be. Emotional well-being, self-esteem,...
01:37Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...