Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System

Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS)
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:

Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records

Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records

Maintaining nurses' educational and administrative records in healthcare settings, including hospitals and nursing schools, is paramount. Here's a breakdown of the types of academic records mentioned:

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare settings,...

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Age moderates association between set shifting and complex rhythm performance in healthy adults.

Brain and cognition·2026

Same author

Clarifying the Addition of Scientific Thinking as a Subdomain to the COEPA and 2025 ACPE Standards.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2025

Same author

Career-Mentoring Options for Pharmacy Faculty and Staff: Navigating the Three Phases of Cancer Survivorship.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2025

Same author

Across the Annual Meeting Tables: Evaluating Pharmacy Faculty Members' Understanding of COEPA Assessment Strategies.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2025

Same author

Deciding Whether to Communicate a Cancer Diagnosis at Work.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2025

Same author

A Curricular Assessment Blueprint and Needs Analysis for the Curricular Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

A curriculum review and mapping process supported by an electronic database system.

Mark Britton¹, Nancy Letassy, Melissa S Medina

¹College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901, USA. mark-britton@ouhsc.edu

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

|February 14, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Pharmacy programs face challenges in curriculum mapping and review. The University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy developed a peer review process and electronic system to manage data and improve outcomes.

Keywords:

assessment curriculum curriculum mapping evaluation instructional technology

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Pharmacy Education
Curriculum Development
Quality Improvement

Background:

Curriculum mapping and review are essential for continuous quality improvement in pharmacy programs.
Implementation and sustainability of these initiatives pose challenges for higher education institutions.
Success requires faculty dedication, systematic approaches, creativity, and institutional leadership.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the implementation of a peer review process for curriculum mapping and evaluation at the University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy.
To detail the development of an electronic Pharmacy Curriculum Management System (PCMS).
To outline how the PCMS supports faculty in managing curricular data and monitoring outcomes.

Main Methods:

Implemented a peer review process for ongoing curriculum mapping and evaluation.
Developed an electronic Pharmacy Curriculum Management System (PCMS).
Utilized the PCMS to manage curricular data, monitor program outcomes, and enhance stakeholder communication across two campuses and the state.

Main Results:

The peer review process and PCMS facilitated faculty efforts in curriculum management.
The system supported data management, outcome monitoring, and improved communication.
Stakeholder engagement was enhanced across multiple locations.

Conclusions:

A peer review process, supported by an electronic management system, can effectively address challenges in pharmacy curriculum mapping and evaluation.
The developed system aids in sustaining continuous quality improvement initiatives.
Leadership and systematic approaches are crucial for successful curriculum management in pharmacy education.