Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines01:14

Mechanical Efficiency of Real Machines

The mechanical efficiency of a machine is a fundamental concept that describes how effectively a machine can convert input work into output work. According to this concept, the efficiency of a machine is equal to the ratio of the output work to the input work. An ideal machine, meaning a machine that has no energy losses, has an efficiency of one. This implies that the input work and the output work are equal.
However, in reality, no machine can be truly ideal, and all of them experience some...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regretting a chance to connect: How neural responses to missed social opportunities predict self-disclosure.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Regime shift detection and neurocomputational substrates for under and overreactions to change.

eLife·2026
Same author

Multi-Collaborator Engagement to Identify Research Priorities for Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Occupation-Based Collaborator Engagement in Research: Developing a Cerebral Palsy Task Force.

OTJR : occupation, participation and health·2025
Same author

Neural Responses to Monetary Gain and Loss in Individuals Recovering From Opioid Use Disorder Compared with Controls.

Journal of integrative neuroscience·2025
Same author

Effectiveness and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA in pediatric lower limb spasticity: A phase IV, prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Developmental medicine and child neurology·2025
Same journal

Chemotactic self-organization captures the dynamics of mammalian hair follicle patterning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Tomographic imaging of superconducting order using particle-hole interference.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inferring epidemiological parameters under an infectious phylogeography model with visitor dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Analytical modeling for suction cup designs for skin-interfaced wearable devices.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Improving cell-free metabolism through direct integration of artificial respiratory chains.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Economic decision-making compared with an equivalent motor task.

Shih-Wei Wu1, Mauricio R Delgado, Laurence T Maloney

  • 1Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. shihwei@caltech.edu

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|April 1, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Human decision-making differs between economic choices and motor tasks. While value perception remains consistent, probability weighting significantly changes, impacting risk-seeking behavior in motor contexts.

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroeconomics
  • Decision science

Background:

  • Human economic decisions often deviate from expected utility theory (EUT).
  • Performance in perceptual and motor tasks often aligns with EUT.
  • Discrepancies may stem from domain differences or experimental design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if decision-making differences between economic and motor tasks are inherent or design-related.
  • To compare choices between classical economic lotteries and equivalent motor lotteries within the same subjects.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a motor task mathematically equivalent to economic lotteries.
  • Experiment 1: Compared choices between classical and motor lotteries.
  • Experiment 2: Modeled choices using cumulative prospect theory, estimating value and probability weighting functions for both tasks.

Main Results:

  • Subjects exhibited greater risk-seeking behavior in motor lotteries compared to economic lotteries.
  • No significant differences were found in how subjects valued outcomes across tasks.
  • Probability weighting functions differed significantly: economic tasks showed overweighting of small probabilities, while motor tasks showed the opposite pattern.

Conclusions:

  • Individuals distort probability differently based on task format (economic vs. motor), even for identical decisions.
  • Value representation remains consistent across these decision formats.
  • Differential probability weighting explains the observed increase in risk-seeking in motor decision tasks.