Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Clinical Anthropometrics and Body Composition from 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2024
Comparison of body height estimation using bipeds or cylinders
1Department of Digital Technology and Biometrics, Netherlands Forensic Institute, Laan van Ypenburg 6, 2497 GB Den Haag, The Netherlands. g.edelman@nfi.minjus.nl
Abstract:
A well-known method for performing body height measurements on images uses a 3D model of the crime scene, projected onto the image. In the 3D model the height of persons on images can be measured using either cylinders or bipeds (3D humanoids). The study compares the performance of taking body height measurements on the basis of both tools. To this, measurements were compared to actual heights in a pilot study that involved images of four perpetrators, one not standing straight. Differences in systematic and random measurement error were studied, showing no significant difference in behavior between the methods. Systematic measurement error is regularly occurring for the biped method as well (two out of four cases), so bipeds are not preferable to cylinders in this respect. Next to this, random measurement errors for the two methods seem comparable. Since the fitting of bipeds is more labor-intensive, there seems to be limited sense in preferring this method to using cylinders to measure body heights in 3D models.
Related Concept Videos
Estimation of the Physical Quantities
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Centroid of a Body: Problem Solving
The x-coordinates and y-coordinates of each element's...
