Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...

Controls in Experiments

Controls in Experiments

When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Expression patterns of risk genes associated with three evolutionarily relevant syndromes in rhesus macaque and human brains.

Translational psychiatry·2026

Same author

The Effect of Intramuscular Injection Training Delivered via the Pecha Kucha Method on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Skill, and Satisfaction Levels: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The Journal of nursing education·2026

Same author

Meta-Analysis of Median Survival Times With Inverse-Variance Weighting.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Digital Stethoscope-Derived Single-Lead Electrocardiogram and Artificial Intelligence to Detect Low Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2026

Same author

The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance defecography in differentiating evacuation disorders among patients with manometric dyssynergia.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026

Same author

Disentangling the Role of Microbiota: A Special Emphasis on Lepidoptera.

Current microbiology·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

An exact control-versus-treatment comparison test based on ranked set samples.

Omer Ozturk¹, N Balakrishnan

¹Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, 1958 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. omer@stat.osu.edu

|May 13, 2009

Summary

A new statistical test using ranked set samples identifies differences between control and treatment groups. This method is effective for comparing medians across multiple populations in experiments.

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

RBDT: A Computerized Task System based in Transposition for the Continuous Analysis of Relational Behavior Dynamics in Humans

Published on: July 17, 2021

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Statistics
Experimental Design

Background:

Comparing multiple treatment groups against a control is crucial in experimental research.
Existing methods may not fully leverage ranked set sampling for median comparisons.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a novel multiple comparison test procedure for control-versus-treatment scenarios.
To utilize ranked set samples for enhanced statistical power in median comparisons.

Main Methods:

The procedure is based on K-independent exact median confidence intervals.
It involves comparing the disjointness of confidence intervals between the control and treatment groups.
Ranked set sampling is employed to generate the data for analysis.

Main Results:

The proposed test rejects the null hypothesis of equal medians when control and treatment group median confidence intervals are disjoint.
The method was successfully illustrated using data from an agricultural experiment, demonstrating its practical applicability.

Conclusions:

The developed test provides a robust method for control-versus-treatment comparisons using ranked set samples.
This approach offers a valuable tool for analyzing data where medians are of primary interest, particularly in agricultural research.