Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

A Machine-Vision Approach to Transmission Electron Microscopy Workflows, Results Analysis and Data Management
Published on: June 23, 2023
MOSFET dosimetry with high spatial resolution in intense synchrotron-generated x-ray microbeams
E A Siegbahn1, E Bräuer-Krisch, A Bravin
1European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), 6 Rue Jules Horowitz, 38043 Grenoble, France. siegbahn1@gmail.com
Metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors were used to measure dose distributions from x-ray microbeams for microbeam radiation therapy (MRT). Discrepancies between simulations and measurements highlight the need for accurate dosimeter calibration in MRT research.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Dosimetry
Background:
- Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) utilizes precisely shaped x-ray microbeams for targeted irradiation.
- Accurate dose assessment with microscopic spatial resolution is crucial for MRT efficacy and safety.
- Metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors offer the necessary narrow sensitive element for microbeam dosimetry.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess absorbed doses using MOSFET detectors in targets irradiated by synchrotron-generated x-ray microbeams.
- To measure dose distributions and calculate peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs) using different multislit collimators (MSCs).
- To compare experimental measurements with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for absorbed dose distribution.
Main Methods:
- Utilized MOSFET detectors to measure dose distributions from x-ray microbeam arrays in a tissue-equivalent phantom.
- Employed two different multislit collimators (MSCs) to shape the x-ray microbeams.
- Performed Monte Carlo (MC) simulations to model absorbed dose distribution and compared with experimental data.
Main Results:
- MC simulations overestimated PVDRs by up to a factor of 3 compared to measurements for microbeam heights below 1 mm.
- Discrepancies between measured and simulated PVDRs decreased to <50% for larger microbeam arrays (25 microm x 1 cm).
- Closer agreement between measured and simulated PVDRs was observed for the Tecomet MSC compared to the Archer MSC.
Conclusions:
- Discrepancies between MC simulations and MOSFET measurements in PVDRs are significant, particularly for smaller microbeam dimensions.
- The energy-dependent response of MOSFET detectors is a key factor contributing to the observed discrepancies.
- Accurate dosimetry and careful validation of simulation models are essential for advancing microbeam radiation therapy research and application.
Related Concept Videos
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy
Transmission Electron Microscopy

