Related Experiment Videos
Human health risks associated with asbestos abatement
P C Chrostowski1, S A Foster, E L Anderson
1Clement International Corporation, Fairfax, Virginia 22031-1207.
Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|September 1, 1991
Summary
Asbestos abatement activities pose risks to workers, often exceeding acceptable levels. However, the "no-action" alternative may be preferable under EPA Superfund risk criteria for managing asbestos exposure.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Health
- Occupational Safety
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) pose health risks, necessitating abatement procedures.
- Regulatory frameworks like EPA's Superfund program guide risk assessment for environmental contaminants.
- Occupational exposure limits (OELs) exist for asbestos, but risk levels vary by activity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To calculate upperbound lifetime excess cancer risks for asbestos abatement activities.
- To compare these risks against established benchmarks, including EPA Superfund criteria and OELs.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of asbestos abatement in reducing risks to building occupants and the public.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a risk assessment framework developed for EPA's Superfund program.
- Calculated upperbound lifetime excess cancer risks for various asbestos abatement scenarios.
- Compared calculated risks to the commonly accepted cancer risk level (1 x 10^-6) and OELs (1 x 10^-3).
Main Results:
- Asbestos removals were associated with worker cancer risks often exceeding 1 x 10^-6.
- Risks to school populations from removals were minimal and did not significantly reduce existing exposure.
- Careless building maintenance posed the highest risk to workers, followed by removals and encapsulation.
Conclusions:
- Under EPA Superfund risk criteria, the 'no-action' alternative might be favored over removal in many cases.
- Asbestos abatement risks to workers and nearby individuals increase during the process.
- Effective asbestos risk management requires considering fiber characteristics, exposure scenarios, and population size.