Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Glass ionomer cement hardness after different materials for surface protection
Cecilia R Brito1, Leandro G Velasco, Gabriela A V C Bonini
1Research Department/Council of Researches in Education and Sciences, Santos, Brazil. draceciliabrito@gmail.com
Nail varnish significantly improved glass ionomer cement (GIC) hardness, but petroleum jelly is a safer alternative for surface protection. This study evaluated GIC Knoop hardness with various protective coatings.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Surface Chemistry
Background:
- Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a widely used dental restorative material.
- Surface protection is crucial for maintaining the integrity and longevity of GIC restorations.
- Various protective agents are available, but their efficacy on GIC hardness requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the Knoop hardness of a high-viscosity GIC (Ketac Molar Easy Mix) when protected by different surface agents.
- To compare the effectiveness of Copal varnish, adhesive systems, petroleum jelly, and nail varnish against a control group.
Main Methods:
- Sixty GIC specimens were prepared and divided into six groups, each receiving a different surface treatment.
- Specimens underwent Knoop hardness testing initially, after 30 days, and after 4 months.
- Statistical analysis using Two-way ANOVA and Tukey Test was performed to determine significant differences.
Main Results:
- Nail varnish demonstrated a statistically significant increase in GIC Knoop hardness compared to the control group (p < 0.001).
- Copal varnish, adhesive systems (Magic bond, Adper Single Bond 2), and petroleum jelly showed no significant difference in hardness compared to the untreated control.
- No significant differences were observed among the tested materials and the control group after 30 days and 4 months, except for nail varnish.
Conclusions:
- Nail varnish appears to be the most effective surface protection agent for enhancing GIC Knoop hardness.
- Due to potential adverse effects, solid petroleum jelly is suggested as a safer, viable alternative for surface protection of GIC.
- Further research into the biocompatibility and long-term effects of nail varnish on GIC is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Toughness and Hardness of Aggregate
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...
Types of Cement I
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Mortar Properties
Types of Cement II
Fineness of Cement
Direct...