Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication
16:38

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication

Published on: June 6, 2012

Controlling biological interfaces on the nanometer length scale.

Ray C Schmidt1, Kevin E Healy

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A
|July 9, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Drug Proarrhythmic Evaluation in a High Throughput Cardiac New Approach Methodology.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Tissue Regeneration Consortium (DOCTRC): An infrastructure for accelerating regenerative therapies from discovery to clinical impact.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

Repairing Volumetric Muscle Loss with Skeletal Muscle Units and Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel in Rats.

Tissue engineering. Part A·2025
Same author

Pillar arrays as tunable interfacial barriers for microphysiological systems.

Communications engineering·2025
Same author

A microphysiological system for screening lipid nanoparticle-mRNA complexes predicts in vivo heart transfection efficacy.

Nature biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Nonclinical Human Cardiac New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) Predict Vanoxerine-Induced Proarrhythmic Potential.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2025
Same journal

Granular Hydrogel Composites for Noninvasive Optical Biosensing.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same journal

Performance Evaluation of Highly Uniform Astragalus Polysaccharide/Silk Fibroin Microspheres Fabricated via Microfluidics as Biodegradable Fillers: Collagen Regeneration and Tissue Reaction.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same journal

Combining Supramolecular and Covalent Chemistry to Form Reinforced Fibrillar Network Hydrogels From Fibrinogen Derivatives.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same journal

Bioactive-Loaded Detachable Crosslinked Hyaluronic Acid Microneedles: Structural Validation and Clinical Anti-Wrinkle Efficacy.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same journal

Tunable Sol-Gel Transition in Poloxamer Blends for Injectable Osteoarticular Applications.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
Same journal

Development and Evaluation of Polyvinyl Alcohol/Carboxymethyl Chitosan Hydrocolloid Incorporating Cynodon dactylon Extract and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle for Bedsore Healing in a Wistar Rat Model.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A·2026
See all related articles

Researchers can create nanoscale chemical and topographical patterns on surfaces to better mimic natural environments and study cell behavior. This review examines common nanopatterning techniques for biomaterials research.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Nanotechnology
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Nanoscale patterning of surfaces is crucial for mimicking the extracellular environment.
  • Current techniques allow for controlled chemical and topographical surface modifications.
  • These patterned surfaces are vital for studying cell-substrate and cell-cell interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review common nanopatterning techniques used in biomaterials.
  • To critically evaluate the resolution and scalability of these methods.
  • To assess their suitability for statistically relevant cell culture studies.

Main Methods:

  • Review of scanning probe lithography
  • Review of electron beam lithography
  • Review of colloidal lithography

More Related Videos

Using Synthetic Biology to Engineer Living Cells That Interface with Programmable Materials
10:28

Using Synthetic Biology to Engineer Living Cells That Interface with Programmable Materials

Published on: March 9, 2017

Nanomechanics of Drug-target Interactions and Antibacterial Resistance Detection
11:56

Nanomechanics of Drug-target Interactions and Antibacterial Resistance Detection

Published on: October 25, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication
16:38

Bridging the Bio-Electronic Interface with Biofabrication

Published on: June 6, 2012

Using Synthetic Biology to Engineer Living Cells That Interface with Programmable Materials
10:28

Using Synthetic Biology to Engineer Living Cells That Interface with Programmable Materials

Published on: March 9, 2017

Nanomechanics of Drug-target Interactions and Antibacterial Resistance Detection
11:56

Nanomechanics of Drug-target Interactions and Antibacterial Resistance Detection

Published on: October 25, 2013

  • Review of imprint lithography

    • Main Results:

    • Nanopatterning enables precise control over surface chemistry and topography.
    • Techniques vary in resolution and scalability for biomaterials applications.
    • Suitability for cell studies depends on achieving statistically relevant surface generation.

    Conclusions:

    • Nanoprinting techniques offer powerful tools for creating biomimetic surfaces.
    • Selection of technique depends on required resolution and scale.
    • Further development is needed for large-scale, statistically valid cell studies.