Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules starts when DNA polymerase links nucleotides together in a sequence that is complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity for the correct base to ensure fidelity in DNA replication. The DNA polymerase furthermore proofreads during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.Errors during Replication Are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase EnzymeGenomic DNA is synthesized in...
Proofreading01:31

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore,  it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase Enzyme
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

Synthesis of new DNA molecules starts when DNA polymerase links nucleotides together in a sequence that is complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity for the correct base to ensure fidelity in DNA replication. The DNA polymerase furthermore proofreads during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.Errors during Replication Are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase EnzymeGenomic DNA is synthesized in...
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

Overview

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The rise of bispecific antibodies for dual targeting, singular impact: technology and clinical advancements.

International immunopharmacology·2026
Same author

Microglia-mediated protection against Alzheimer's disease pathology and detrimental effects in white matter revealed by Ptpn6 deletion.

Neuron·2026
Same author

From Venom-to-Vial-to-Pill: The Translational Journey of GLP-1 Peptides and the Evolving Landscape of Biopharmaceutics Modeling.

Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society·2026
Same author

From lab-to-clinic with model informed formulation development: a case study of hydroxyzine SR tablets.

Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems·2025
Same author

Advancements in Ocular Modelling and Simulations: Key Considerations and Case Studies.

AAPS PharmSciTech·2024
Same author

Systematic perturbation screens identify regulators of inflammatory macrophage states and a role for TNF mRNA m6A modification.

Nature genetics·2024
Same journal

Preface.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Mindfulness and meditation: Promoting emotional and cognitive health.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Cognitive stimulation enhancing memory and mental function.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

The science behind non-pharmacological interventions.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Technology-assisted interventions for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025
Same journal

Ethical consideration in non-pharmacological treatments for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Attention for action during error correction.

K M Sharika1, Supriya Ray, Aditya Murthy

  • 1National Brain Research Centre, Nainwal More, Manesar, Haryana, India.

Progress in Brain Research
|September 8, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Executive attention guides goal-directed actions by integrating performance monitoring and response inhibition. This study reveals predictive error correction in saccadic eye movements, demonstrating how these executive functions interact to optimize behavior.

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Oculomotor Control

Background:

  • Executive attention is crucial for coordinating goal-directed behaviors, but its subcomponents remain incompletely understood.
  • Performance monitoring and response inhibition are key proposed modules within executive attention.
  • Visuomotor control, particularly saccadic eye movements during double-step tasks, offers a model for studying these executive mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the executive mechanisms regulating saccadic eye movements in double-step tasks.
  • To examine the interplay between performance monitoring, response inhibition, and error correction in goal-directed behavior.
  • To provide behavioral and neural evidence for predictive error correction during visuomotor control.

Main Methods:

  • Behavioral experiments using double-step and target-shift double-step saccadic tasks.
  • Quantitative modeling of saccadic reaction times to analyze response patterns.
  • Analysis of neural data from the frontal cortex of monkeys performing similar tasks.

Main Results:

  • Behavioral data provided evidence for fast, corrective responses indicative of predictive error correction.
  • Neural data from monkey frontal cortex supported the behavioral findings on predictive error correction.
  • Data suggested an interaction between inhibitory control and error correction, particularly when error likelihood is high.

Conclusions:

  • Predictive error correction plays a significant role in regulating saccadic eye movements during goal-directed tasks.
  • Executive control involves an interaction between error detection/correction and inhibitory processes.
  • Combining behavioral analysis with electrophysiological recordings offers a powerful approach to understanding executive control mechanisms.