Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt Principles of Perception

Gestalt principles provide a framework for understanding how humans perceive objects as unified wholes within their context. These principles are essential in explaining the cognitive processes that make sense of complex visual stimuli by organizing them into coherent groups. One fundamental principle is proximity, which posits that objects located close to each other are perceived as a collective group. For instance, when dots are positioned near one another, the visual system interprets them...

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...

Factors Affecting Perception

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

Incomplete Dominance

Incomplete Dominance

Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Working Memory Maintenance of Visual and Auditory Spatial Information Relies on Supramodal Neural Codes in the Dorsal Frontoparietal Cortex.

Brain sciences·2024

Same author

What, if anything, can be considered an amodal sensory dimension?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Prokofiev was (almost) right: A cross-cultural investigation of auditory-conceptual associations in Peter and the Wolf.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024

Same author

Prevalence and predictors of binge eating disorder symptoms among a sample of university students in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional survey.

Health science reports·2023

Same author

More of me: Self-prioritization of numeric stimuli.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2023

Same author

Enhancing the design of wine labels.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Same journal

Preface.

Progress in brain research·2025

Same journal

Mindfulness and meditation: Promoting emotional and cognitive health.

Progress in brain research·2025

Same journal

Cognitive stimulation enhancing memory and mental function.

Progress in brain research·2025

Same journal

The science behind non-pharmacological interventions.

Progress in brain research·2025

Same journal

Technology-assisted interventions for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025

Same journal

Ethical consideration in non-pharmacological treatments for neuropsychiatric disorders.

Progress in brain research·2025

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Charles Spence¹

¹Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. charles.spence@psy.ox.ac.uk

Progress in Brain Research

|September 8, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

The Colavita visual dominance effect occurs when people miss auditory targets with simultaneous visual stimuli. This study reviews existing research and proposes a new explanation based on asymmetrical cross-modal influences.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Multisensory Perception

Background:

The Colavita visual dominance effect describes a phenomenon where auditory targets are missed during simultaneous audiovisual stimuli.
This effect contrasts with research indicating superior multisensory information processing.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the empirical literature on the Colavita visual dominance effect.
To identify key factors modulating the effect.
To propose a novel explanation for the Colavita effect.

Main Methods:

Review of existing empirical studies on the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Analysis of factors influencing the visual dominance effect.
Development of a new theoretical account based on cross-modal interactions.

Main Results:

Previous explanations for the Colavita effect, including visual attention bias, have been empirically refuted.
Evidence suggests that existing accounts do not adequately explain the observed phenomenon.
The review highlights the need for a new theoretical framework.

Conclusions:

The Colavita visual dominance effect is not explained by previous theories.
A novel explanation is proposed, emphasizing asymmetrical cross-modal influences between auditory and visual stimuli.
This new perspective offers a more accurate understanding of multisensory integration and response inhibition.