Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
12:10
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
TVT or TOT? When to avoid retropubic trocar passage
Anna R McNanley1, Gunhilde M Buchsbaum
1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. anna_mcnanley@urmc.rochester.edu
International Urogynecology Journal
|September 17, 2009
Summary
Surgeons often prefer specific techniques for minimally invasive suburethral slings to treat stress urinary incontinence. However, certain patient conditions may require alternative surgical approaches, as illustrated in two case studies.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects many women.
- Suburethral slings are a common surgical treatment for SUI.
- Minimally invasive techniques are preferred for sling placement.
Observation:
- Surgeons typically have a preferred method for suburethral sling placement.
- Clinical scenarios can arise where standard approaches are not suitable.
- Two specific cases are presented where a retropubic approach was contraindicated.
Findings:
- The presented cases highlight situations necessitating modifications to standard sling placement.
- A retropubic approach to suburethral sling placement was not feasible in these instances.
- Alternative surgical considerations are crucial for complex SUI cases.
Implications:
- This work emphasizes the need for surgical flexibility in treating SUI.
- Understanding contraindications for specific surgical approaches is vital for patient care.
- Further research into alternative sling placement techniques may be warranted.
