Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Critical Thinking I01:24

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-term effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation in primary progressive aphasia: study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (RECONNECT-PLUS).

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Health-Related Quality of Life in Radiologically Isolated Syndrome Resembles Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Impact of blood p-tau217 testing on diagnosis and diagnostic confidence in cognitive disorders: a real-world clinical study.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Ventral attention network connectivity differentiates radiologically isolated syndrome from multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal resting-state fMRI study.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same author

Cell Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Clinical Advances, Limitations, and Future Perspectives from Clinical Studies-A Systematic Review.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Verbal fluency in Parkinson's disease with mild cognitive impairment: quantitative, qualitative, and semantic network analyses.

Parkinsonism & related disorders·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

[Improvement and decision-making process of an article].

Jorge Matías-Guiu, R García Ramos

    Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain)
    |October 3, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary

    Peer review (PR) is a crucial scientific publication process where experts critique manuscripts for quality and improvement. While PR has drawbacks, its value lies in enhancing articles and correcting errors, serving authors regardless of publication outcome.

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific Publishing
    • Scholarly Communication

    Background:

    • Peer review (PR) is the established method for evaluating and enhancing scientific publications.
    • Experts provide constructive criticism to authors and advise editors on manuscript acceptability.

    Discussion:

    • Analysis of PR characteristics including impartiality, equality, confidentiality, and competence.
    • Examining the role of these characteristics in manuscript decision-making and article improvement.

    Key Insights:

    • PR is more a cultural practice than a quantifiable method.
    • Editors are best positioned to assess the benefits and effectiveness of peer reviewers.
    • Despite disadvantages like time consumption and potential author discouragement, PR improves articles, corrects errors, and identifies distortions.

    More Related Videos

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
    07:05

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

    Published on: September 10, 2018

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
    05:48

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

    Published on: June 12, 2020

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
    07:05

    Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

    Published on: September 10, 2018

    Outlook:

    • PR should be viewed as a tool for manuscript enhancement, benefiting authors irrespective of publication.
    • Future considerations for optimizing the peer review process to maximize its benefits.