Consensus conference on intracranial atherosclerotic disease: rationale, methodology, and results
Adnan I Qureshi1, Edward Feldmann, Camilo R Gomez
1Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. aiqureshi@hotmail.com
Insights
Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) management principles are outlined, emphasizing aggressive risk factor control and antithrombotic therapy. Stenting shows promise for severe ICAD cases, with ongoing trials comparing it to intensive medical management.
Area of Science:
- Neurology and Vascular Medicine
- Cardiovascular Research
- Epidemiology of Cerebrovascular Diseases
Background:
- Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) disproportionately affects certain ethnic groups, posing a significant risk for recurrent stroke.
- Patients with symptomatic ICAD (50-99% stenosis) face a substantial risk of subsequent stroke, even with antithrombotic treatment.
- Current medical management focuses on thrombo-embolism prevention, plaque stabilization, and managing atherogenic risk factors.
Framework:
- A consensus conference utilized the Delphi method to establish management principles and research priorities for ICAD.
- Guidelines recommend antiplatelet therapies (aspirin, aspirin/dipyridamole, clopidogrel) over anticoagulation for non-cardioembolic stroke/TIA.
- Aggressive management of atherogenic risk factors is supported by subgroup analyses from randomized trials.
Implementation:
- Intracranial angioplasty with stenting is an emerging option for symptomatic ICAD, especially with high-grade stenosis and medication failure.
- Comparative studies suggest potential benefits of stent placement for stenosis between 70-99%.
- The NIH-funded SAMMPRIS trial is actively comparing stenting plus aggressive medical management against intensive medical management alone.
Implications:
- The consensus proceedings offer a standardized approach to ICAD patient care.
- Identified research priorities will guide future studies to optimize ICAD treatment strategies.
- Further research is crucial to refine therapeutic options and improve outcomes for patients with ICAD.
Abstract:
The consensus conference on intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) identifies principles of management, and research priorities in various aspects upon which leading experts can agree (using "Delphi" method). ICAD is more prevalent in Asian, Hispanic, and African-American populations. Patients who have had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) attributed to stenosis (50-99%) of a major intracranial artery face a 12-14% risk of subsequent stroke during the 2-year period after the initial ischemic event, despite treatment with antithrombotic medications. The annual risk of subsequent stroke may exceed 20% in high-risk groups. The medical treatment of patients with symptomatic ICAD is directed toward: 1. Prevention of intraluminal thrombo-embolism, 2. plaque stabilization and regression, and 3. management of atherogenic risk factors. In patients with ICAD, short-term and long-term anticoagulation (compared with aspirin) have not shown to be beneficial. The current guidelines recommend that aspirin monotherapy, the combination of aspirin and extended release dipyridamole, and clopidogrel monotherapy (rather than oral anticoagulants) are all acceptable options in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke and TIA. Overall, the subgroup analysis from randomized trials provides evidence about benefit of aggressive atherogenic risk factor management among patients with ICAD. Intracranial angioplasty with or without stent placement has evolved as a therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic ICAD, particularly those with high-grade stenosis with recurrent ischemic symptoms and/or medication failure. A matched comparison between medical-treated patients in the Warfarin Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) study and stent-treated patients in the National Institutes of Health intracranial stent registry concluded that stent placement may offer benefit in patients with 70-99% stenosis. The 5-year, multicenter, prospective, randomized Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent stroke in Intracranial Stenosis study supported by the National Institutes of Health is currently comparing stent placement with intense medical management with intense medical management alone in patients with high-grade symptomatic intracranial stenosis. The proceedings of the consensus conference provide a template for standardizing management of patients with ICAD and determining research priorities.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

