Related Experiment Videos
Effectiveness of a protocol-based strategy for achieving better blood pressure control in general practice
Marshall Godwin1, Richard Birtwhistle, Rachelle Seguin
1Department of Family Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada. godwinm@mun.ca
Insights
An intensive, protocol-based strategy significantly improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in family practice. This approach demonstrated effectiveness and adherence among physicians and patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Primary Care Medicine
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Hypertension management remains a challenge, with many patients not reaching target blood pressure levels.
- Effective strategies are needed to improve blood pressure control in primary care settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive, protocol-based strategy for blood pressure control in family practice.
- To assess the adherence of family physicians and hypertensive patients to this intensive protocol.
Main Methods:
- A cluster randomized controlled trial involving 19 family physicians and 156 hypertensive patients.
- Intervention group received protocol-guided management with frequent visits and medication adjustments over 16 weeks.
- Control group received usual care; outcomes measured at 12 months.
Main Results:
- The intensive intervention group showed significantly greater reductions in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to the usual care group.
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring revealed a 4.5 mmHg reduction in diastolic BP for the intervention group versus 0.5 mmHg for controls.
- Physicians adjusted medication in 52% of visits, and 80% of intervention patients attended at least half the scheduled visits.
Conclusions:
- An intensive, protocol-based management approach is effective for achieving blood pressure control in hypertensive patients within a family practice setting.
- The protocol allows for physician judgment, enhancing its applicability and adherence.
- This strategy offers a viable solution to improve hypertension management outcomes.
Background:
There continues be a problem with the proportion of treated hypertension patients who are actually at recommended blood pressure targets.
Objective:
Is an intensive protocol-based strategy for achieving blood pressure control effective in family practice and will family physicians and their hypertensive patients adhere to such a protocol.
Methods:
Design of the study is a cluster randomized controlled trial at the Centre for Studies in Primary Care, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario. Participants were 19 family physicians and 156 (98 intervention group and 58 control group) of their patients in and around the Kingston area. Patients were eligible if they had a diagnosis of hypertension and had not yet achieved their target blood pressure. Patients in the intervention group were managed according to a protocol that involved seeing their family doctor every 2 weeks over a 16-week period and having their antihypertensive medication regimen adjusted at each visit if target was not achieved. This was compared to usual care. Main outcomes were primary effectiveness outcome measured at 12 months was the differences in blood pressure between baseline and 12 months in the two groups. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included rates of achieving BP target and compliance with protocol by physicians and patients. Adherence outcomes were assessed by determining the number of visits made during the 16-week intervention period and the increase in the number of drugs being used.
Results:
Of the patients enrolled, 72 (74%) from the intervention group and 41 (71%) in the control group were available for analysis. Improvement between baseline and 12-month follow-up was significantly better for the intervention group than the control for diastolic mean daytime BP on 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (4.5 mmHg reduction versus 0.5 mmHg reduction) and for both systolic (14.7 mmHg reduction versus 2.7 mmHg reduction) and diastolic (7.4 mmHg reduction versus 0.6 mmHg increase) blood pressure on BpTRU. Of the 98 patients in the intervention, 80% attended four or more of the eight visits and 25% attended all eight visits; physicians increased the number or dosage of drugs the patient was taking in 52% of the visits. Conclusions. An intensive, protocol-based, management approach to achieving blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in family practice is effective and works even when there is flexibility built into the algorithm to allow family physicians to use their judgement in individual patients.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Atherosclerosis III: Management