Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026
09:36
Measurement of Spatial Stability in Precision Grip
Published on: June 4, 2020
Optimal measurement strategies for effective suppression of drift errors
1Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. vvyashchuk@lbl.gov
The Review of Scientific Instruments
|December 2, 2009
Summary
Drifting experimental setups limit precision measurements. This study presents a general method and optimal strategies to effectively suppress slow drift errors in various instruments, improving measurement accuracy.
Area of Science:
- * Measurement Science and Instrumentation
- * Applied Physics
Background:
- * Environmental conditions like temperature changes cause experimental setup drift, a significant limitation in precision measurements.
- * Drift errors are distinct from random noise and systematic errors, often resisting averaging or precise calibration.
- * Slow drifts introduce spurious effects that compromise the accuracy of scientific instruments.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To introduce a general and effective method for suppressing spurious effects caused by slow drifts in experimental setups.
- * To analytically derive an identity for optimal measurement strategies to mitigate drift contributions.
- * To provide a mathematical proof and recursion rule for the proposed identity.
Main Methods:
- * Analytical derivation of an identity defining optimal measurement strategies for drift suppression.
- * Development of a recursion rule and general mathematical proof for the derived identity.
- * Application of optimal scanning strategies to precise surface slope measurements using a surface profiler.
Main Results:
- * A general method for effective suppression of slow drift effects is presented.
- * An identity is derived, specifying optimal measurement strategies for polynomial drift functions.
- * The method's effectiveness is demonstrated through application to surface slope measurements.
Conclusions:
- * The developed method offers a general solution for mitigating drift errors in precision measurements.
- * Optimal measurement strategies can significantly suppress the impact of slow drifts.
- * This approach enhances the accuracy of instruments like surface profilers by addressing environmental drift.
Related Concept Videos
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
01:17Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...