The spatial and temporal shape of oculomotor inhibition
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Quantification of Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
Published on: June 23, 2023
Eugene McSorley1, Patrick Haggard, Robin Walker
1School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Harry Pitt Building, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AL, UK. e.mcsorley@reading.ac.uk
Abstract:
Selecting a stimulus as the target for a goal-directed movement involves inhibiting other competing possible responses. Inhibition has generally proved hard to study behaviorally, because it results in no measurable output. The effect of distractors on the shape of oculomotor and manual trajectories provide evidence of such inhibition. Individual saccades may deviate initially either towards, or away from, a competing distractor - the direction and extent of this deviation depends upon saccade latency, target predictability and the target to distractor separation. The experiment reported here used these effects to show how inhibition of distractor locations develops over time. Distractors could be presented at various distances from unpredictable and predictable targets in two separate experiments. The deviation of saccade trajectories was compared between trials with and without distractors. Inhibition was measured by saccade trajectory deviation. Inhibition was found to increase as the distractor distance from target decreased but was found to increase with saccade latency at all distractor distances (albeit to different peaks). Surprisingly, no differences were found between unpredictable and predictable targets perhaps because our saccade latencies were generally long (approximately 260-280 ms.). We conclude that oculomotor inhibition of saccades to possible target objects involves the same mechanisms for all distractor distances and target types.
Insights
Inhibition of competing saccades develops over time, increasing as distractors get closer to the target. This oculomotor inhibition mechanism is consistent across distractor distances and target types.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Oculomotor Control
- Behavioral Psychology
Background:
- Goal-directed movements require inhibiting competing responses.
- Studying behavioral inhibition is challenging due to lack of measurable output.
- Saccade trajectory deviations offer insights into inhibition mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the temporal development of distractor inhibition in oculomotor control.
- Examine how distractor distance and target predictability influence inhibition.
- Quantify inhibition using saccade trajectory deviations.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments presented distractors at varying distances from predictable and unpredictable targets.
- Measured saccade trajectory deviations in trials with and without distractors.
- Analyzed the relationship between inhibition, distractor distance, and saccade latency.
Main Results:
- Inhibition increased as distractor distance decreased.
- Inhibition increased with saccade latency across all distractor distances.
- No significant difference in inhibition between predictable and unpredictable targets was observed, potentially due to long saccade latencies (260-280 ms).
Conclusions:
- Oculomotor inhibition of saccades to potential targets utilizes consistent mechanisms regardless of distractor distance.
- The findings suggest a unified inhibitory process for saccadic eye movements, irrespective of target type or distractor proximity.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

