Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Physiologic lesion assessment during percutaneous coronary intervention
Narbeh Melikian1, Francesca Del Furia, Carlo Di Mario
1Cardiology Department, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK. narbeh.melikian@kcl.ac.uk
Insights
Coronary angiography has limitations in assessing coronary artery disease severity. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) provides crucial functional data, guiding ischemia-driven revascularization for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Coronary angiography's 2D silhouette has limitations in depicting true luminal morphology and functional impact.
- Discrepancies between angiographic findings and clinical presentation are common, especially in intermediate stenoses.
- Accurate physiologic indices are needed to complement angiography in cardiac catheterization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the limitations of coronary angiography.
- To emphasize the role of physiologic indices in guiding coronary revascularization.
- To position fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a key tool in managing coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- Review of limitations of 2D coronary angiography.
- Discussion of the validation and clinical availability of physiologic indices.
- Highlighting fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the gold standard.
Main Results:
- Physiologic indices improve the accuracy of stenosis assessment compared to angiography alone.
- Ischemia-driven revascularization based on physiologic data improves clinical outcomes.
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is indicated for intermediate stenoses, left main, ostial, and serial lesions.
Conclusions:
- Physiologic indices, particularly FFR, are essential adjuncts to angiography.
- Utilizing FFR streamlines patient management in cardiac catheterization.
- An "all-in-one" ischemia-driven revascularization service improves efficiency and outcomes.
Abstract:
The 2-dimensional silhouette image provided by coronary angiography has well-recognized limitations. Angiographic images do not accurately represent the true complexity of the luminal morphology in coronary disease and give no indication of the functional influence of luminal changes on coronary blood flow. These limitations are more pronounced in angiographically intermediate stenoses and in patients in whom there is a clear discrepancy between the clinical picture and angiographic findings. In such cases there is often poor concordance between the estimated percentage angiographic stenosis and the corresponding intravascular ultrasound image or noninvasive functional data. The validation and clinical availability of robust and accurate physiologic indices, which can be used as an adjunct to diagnostic angiography in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, have been pivotal in promoting ischemia-driven coronary revascularization. Deferral or revascularization based on such physiologic indices is associated with improved clinical outcome as well as more favorable health economic data. Although there are several clinical indices, fractional flow reserve remains the "gold standard," with indications for physiologic assessment of angiographic intermediate stenoses, including left main stem stenoses and ostial disease as well as serial lesions. The availability of such indices is an important step in streamlining management of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization by allowing routine provision of an "all-in-one" ischemia-driven revascularization service.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment

