External fixation versus "pi" plate for distal radius fractures
Konstantinos Kateros1, George Macheras, Spyros P Galanakos
1Trauma & Orthopaedics, Livadia General Hospital, Athens. kkateros@hotmail.com
Background:
Fractures of the distal radius are among the most common fractures in orthopedic practice. The purpose of our study was to explore the advantages and disadvantages of two methods of treatment for this type of fracture.
Methods:
One hundred thirteen fractures of the distal radius have been operated; 49 fractures were treated with an external fixator and 64 fractures by internal fixation using a "pi" plate. The mean follow-up was 12 months. Clinical evaluation was performed using the modified Gartland and Werley's Functional Scoring System. Radiographic evaluation was performed using the modified Lidstrom Radiographic Scoring System.
Results:
Clinical results were similar between the two groups of patients (p = 0.46). Radiographic parameters were superior in the group of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation (p = 0.028).
Conclusions:
Final functional results are comparable between external fixation and dorsal "pi" plating.
More Related Videos
11:21Development of a Novel Internal Fixation Model for Rat Radial Fractures: Fracture Healing Assessment and Dorsal Root Ganglion Isolation
Published on: March 13, 2026
08:20A Reliable and Reproducible Critical-Sized Segmental Femoral Defect Model in Rats Stabilized with a Custom External Fixator
Published on: March 24, 2019
