Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Reversible and Irreversible Processes01:14

Reversible and Irreversible Processes

The thermodynamic processes can be classified into reversible and irreversible processes. The processes that can be restored to their initial state are called reversible processes. It is only possible if the process is in quasi-static equilibrium, i.e., it takes place in infinitesimally small steps, and the system remains at equilibrium However, these are ideal processes and do not occur naturally. An ideal system undergoing a reversible process is always in thermodynamic equilibrium within...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhancing the OncoSim-Breast model using Canadian breast density information.

Health reports·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Density-Targeted Supplemental Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening by Breast Cancer Risk: Long-Term Health and Economic Considerations.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Overdiagnosis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

An agent-based model of the effects of limited vaccination on novel respiratory infections.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Five-Year Absolute Risk-Based and Age-Based Breast Cancer Screening in the US.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on thyroid cancer diagnoses in a comprehensive cancer center (2017-2023).

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Flexible Survival Extrapolation with Blended Hazards: Accounting for Treatment Effect Waning in Health Technology Assessment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

A Microsimulation Model for Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the United States: Michigan Model for Diabetes-Chronic Kidney Disease Model.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Statin Adherence: A Historical Cohort Study.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Taste or Scale? Methodological Approach to Health Preferences Comparison across Groups.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

Mind the Gap: Impact of New Labels on Public Perceptions and Calculated Risk of Adverse Outcomes after a Melanoma In Situ Diagnosis-A Secondary Analysis of an Online Randomized Experiment.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same journal

A Metamodel-Based General-Purpose Autocalibration Tool for Simulation Models.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Markov decision processes: a tool for sequential decision making under uncertainty.

Oguzhan Alagoz1, Heather Hsu, Andrew J Schaefer

  • 1Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. alagoz@engr.wisc.edu

Medical Decision Making : an International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
|January 2, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Markov decision processes (MDPs) offer a powerful method for sequential decision-making under uncertainty, proving more efficient than standard Markov models for medical applications like liver transplantation timing.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 17, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Decision Analysis
  • Medical Informatics
  • Operations Research

Background:

  • Markov decision processes (MDPs) are underutilized in medical decision-making despite their effectiveness in industry.
  • Sequential decision-making under uncertainty is crucial in clinical settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a tutorial on constructing and evaluating MDPs for medical decision-making.
  • To demonstrate MDP application in a sequential clinical treatment problem.
  • To compare MDPs with standard Markov models for medical decision analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Tutorial on Markov decision process (MDP) construction and evaluation.
  • Application of MDPs to a living-donor liver transplantation timing problem.
  • Comparison of MDPs against standard Markov-based simulation models.

Main Results:

  • MDPs and Markov models yielded identical optimal policies and life expectancies for liver transplantation.
  • MDP models demonstrated significantly reduced computation time compared to Markov models.
  • The study highlights the advantages of MDPs in medical decision analysis.

Conclusions:

  • MDPs are efficient and effective tools for complex medical decision-making under uncertainty.
  • The adoption of MDPs in medical decision-making can streamline analysis and improve outcomes.
  • Further exploration of MDPs in medical literature is warranted.