Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parseval's Theorem01:18

Parseval's Theorem

Parseval's theorem is a fundamental concept in signal processing and harmonic analysis. It asserts that for a periodic function, the average power of the signal over one period equals the sum of the squared magnitudes of all its complex Fourier coefficients. This theorem, named after Marc-Antoine Parseval, provides a powerful tool for analyzing the energy distribution in signals.
Interestingly, Parseval's theorem also holds for the trigonometric form of the Fourier series, which expresses a...
Levels of Use of a GIS01:29

Levels of Use of a GIS

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) operate across three levels of application, each representing an increasing degree of complexity: data management, analysis, and prediction. These levels reflect the expanding functionality and versatility of GIS technology in handling spatial data for diverse purposes.Data ManagementAt its foundational level, GIS serves as a tool for data management, enabling the input, storage, retrieval, and organization of spatial data. This level is often employed in...
Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Item Response Models for Rating Relational Data.

Psychometrika·2025
Same author

Multilevel multivariate meta-analysis made easy: An introduction to MLMVmeta.

Behavior research methods·2022
Same author

Intermittent faking of personality profiles in high-stakes assessments: A grade of membership analysis.

Psychological methods·2022
Same author

Better Information From Survey Data: Filtering Out State Dependence Using Eye-Tracking Data.

Psychometrika·2021
Same author

Contextual Responses to Affirmative and/or Reversed-Worded Items.

Psychometrika·2019
Same author

Assessing item-feature effects with item response tree models.

The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology·2019

Related Experiment Videos

Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities.

Ulf Böckenholt1

  • 1McGill University, Canada.

Psychometrika
|January 5, 2010
PubMed
Summary

Psychometric choice models, influenced by Thurstone, now use computational advances to handle diverse data and preferences. New methods address behavior inconsistent with traditional assumptions, highlighting interdisciplinary challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Decision science
  • Psychometrics
  • Behavioral economics

Background:

  • Thurstone's foundational work significantly shaped psychometric models of choice behavior.
  • Modern computational advances allow choice models to incorporate varied data types and sources of preference variability.
  • Behavioral research increasingly reveals choice patterns inconsistent with established model assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of psychometric choice models.
  • To explore new modeling approaches for seemingly inconsistent choice behavior.
  • To highlight interdisciplinary frontiers and challenges in choice behavior research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and contemporary psychometric models of choice.
  • Discussion of computational techniques for preference modeling.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of behavioral research challenging standard choice model assumptions.

    • Main Results:

    • Choice models have evolved significantly due to computational power, accommodating complex preference variations.
    • Behavioral data frequently contradicts the assumptions of traditional psychometric choice models.
    • Emerging modeling strategies offer potential solutions for accounting for inconsistent choice behavior.

    Conclusions:

    • The study of choice behavior is at an interdisciplinary frontier, integrating psychometrics, computation, and behavioral science.
    • New modeling avenues are necessary to reconcile theoretical assumptions with observed behavioral inconsistencies.
    • Psychometricians face challenges and opportunities in adapting models to complex, real-world choice phenomena.