Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What's New in Orthopaedic Rehabilitation.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Appropriate translational designs for determining causal force-based (manual therapy) treatment mechanisms.

Musculoskeletal science & practice·2026
Same author

Many Paths to Recovery: The Case for Treatment Pluralism.

The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy·2026
Same author

Modern teaching for clinical education involving manual therapy: a 6-pillar approach.

Chiropractic & manual therapies·2026
Same author

The latent difference score model is a viable alternative to arithmetic difference score-based anchor-driven minimal important change calculation.

Journal of patient-reported outcomes·2026
Same author

Evaluating the integration of the reported treatment mechanisms and goal of treatment in randomized controlled trials for low back pain: protocol for a meta-epidemiological analysis.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Related Experiment Videos

Development of a Quality Checklist Using Delphi Methods for Prescriptive Clinical Prediction Rules: the QUADCPR.

Chad Cook1, Jean-Michel Brismée, Ricardo Pietrobon

  • 1Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC 27708, USA. chad.cook@duke.edu

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
|February 2, 2010
PubMed
Summary

This study developed a consensus-based checklist to standardize the creation of clinical prediction rules (CPRs). The 23-item checklist aims to improve the design and reporting of future CPRs for better clinical decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Clinical decision support
  • Medical informatics
  • Evidence-based medicine

Background:

  • Clinical prediction rules (CPRs) aid clinician decision-making but lack standardized development guidelines.
  • No formal consensus-based guidelines exist for creating CPRs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop consensus-based guidelines for the creation of clinical prediction rules (CPRs).
  • To establish standards for improving CPR design and reporting.

Main Methods:

  • A 3-round Delphi method was employed for consensus.
  • Participants were 9 authors of peer-reviewed prescriptive CPR publications.
  • An initial checklist was derived from literature recommendations.

Main Results:

  • A 23-item checklist was agreed upon by consensus.
  • The checklist includes 4 constructs: sample/participants, outcome measures, quality of tests/measures, and statistical assumptions.
  • The checklist was modified through 3 Delphi rounds.

Conclusions:

  • The developed checklist can enhance the design and reporting of future prescriptive CPRs.
  • Adherence to the checklist may improve the reliability and utility of CPRs in clinical practice.